how about all those terror suspects in the future like these cronies get sent there by law to spend their sentence
:notsureiftroll:
how about all those terror suspects in the future like these cronies get sent there by law to spend their sentence
http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no10/prison.htm
Something to read.
Thanks, Peaps - definitely an interesting read.
But while not defaulting to a "throw away the key" stance (which my questions and points may appear to support),
How much of a career crim's word should we take at face value?
He has repeatedly chosen to risk going back, despite how appalling he claims it to be.
He appears to be uninterested in the harm he may have caused in landing himself back inside; only how he can encourage others to defeat the system. To emerge on the other side, unscathed and unbowed (and, presumably, unchanged).
From what I read, he appears to be a serial recidivist who, once inside, is only interested in standing up for the "rights" of himself and his similarly-incarcerated brethren. He provides a guide on how to "survive" time inside; does this mean he accepts it as an occupational or lifestyle inconvenience? (If he elsewhere posts his regret at his choices that led him to end up banged up, I retract that last assertion).
It appears to me that, if incarceration holds little deterrent for people like the person quoted, and does not alter the behaviour that led them there in the first (or sixteenth, in his case) time, the system ought to be changed. Or failing that, throw away the key, because the law-abiding ought not to be subjected to those who have no regard for their rights
.
Prison is full of people who do their time fighting the system. In my case I was part of a single issue campaign against vivisection. I for one had no regard for the people I campaigned against.
I don't recall commenting on whether prison was a holiday camp, or not.
While I believe that a portion of one's sentence should be about rehabilitation, if that is disregarded by the prisoner, shouldn't that person be separated from "decent" society? Put very simplistically, keep the baddies away from the goodies?
not forgetting of course, so do the criminals.Society has it's role to play.
not forgetting of course, so do the criminals.Society has it's role to play.
Not much Society can do for the ones who are determined to continue committing crimes and say they "accept that jail will be part of your life. It's a risk I accepted and expected at some point to sever time in prison"
Including yourself, you said earlierWe have a sub culture of people who consider prison as part of life
you accept that jail will be part of your life. It's a risk I accepted and expected at some point to sever time in prison.
The prison is full of people who have not had the chance to take part in society, many reasons why, and now you see people in prison who's fathers and grandfathers have done their time many times over. It becomes part of life for some kids. We have a sub culture of people who consider prison as part of life, a badge of honour for alot of the younger end coming up now. The cycle needs to be broken and it's society that has a hand to play at breaking it.
johnjoiner and his ilk won't give ex-cons a chance in life so why else do you think they say f ock you...?
Including yourself, you said earlier
maybe people who are determined to continue committing crimes haven't earned a second chance.
"The cycle needs to be broken and it's society that has a hand to play at breaking it."
Isn't "society" about abiding by the rules as well - it can't be acceptable that the laws of the land are optional, otherwise we would have no society at all. The contributor (Mark) sounded intelligent, but he made an adult choice to utterly disregard the law. His. Free. Will.