He must have been a cowboy all along then. Why else would he stump up?
joe, that's despicable.
Yes. Your admitting your own work is sub standard. Even though it may not be.
It does not mean that at all. I think that's mean.
It is possible to make payments in cases like this without any admission of guilt. It happens all the time, even in high profile cases where hospitals are being sued for medical negligence.
I'm not speaking for mkb at all, but if it were me, I'd have wanted the woman off my back a long long time ago and I'd have been tempted to pay up just do get rid of her. That's what she was banking on, after all.
You obviously have never been unfortunate enough to be in a similar position. Don't you dare scoff and say "I would never be in that position because my workmanship is excellent":
anyone can get caught in a trap like this, even people whose work is faultless. Yes, the complainant may well not have a leg to stand on, but if they are mad enough (and the ones who take good jobs to court
are, they make stuff up and turn a good job into a bad one), they will take it to court and they rely on piling pressure on the good innocent tradesman and rely on them caving in before the date and paying up out of court.
So, I think he's done extremely well to get this far without having a nervous breakdown and I think you're being very unfair having a go at him.