Another cladding fire?

"More than 100 more tower blocks must be urgently stripped of combustible cladding panels in a significant widening of the fire safety crisis since the Grenfell Tower disaster.


High-pressure laminate (HPL) panels, often made from compressed wood and paper and used to produce colourful patterns on new buildings, should be removed “as soon as possible” from housing taller than 18 metres, the government’s expert panel on fire safety demanded on Thursday.


The order (pdf) could affect thousands of tenants and leaseholders who previously believed their homes were safe. Industry experts believe at least 100 residential tower blocks will be affected.

It is not the first time concerns have been raised over HPL cladding. Essex University is removing the panels from a student accommodation block in Southend after it was found to be in breach of building regulations despite being signed off by a building inspector.


The announcement is likely to mean fresh rows over who should pick up the bill, with the cost of stripping and replacing cladding often exceeding £20,000 for each household. There is no sign that the government is planning a bailout.


Experts, led by Roy Wilsher, chair of the National Fire Chiefs Council, said that following fire tests it had become clear that many HPL panels were “very unlikely to adequately resist the spread of fire”.


“Building owners with these systems should immediately take action,” the fire safety panel said. “Action to remediate unsafe HPL should be carried out as soon as possible.”


HPL is widely used but the government has only recently tested it, having focused on cladding similar to the aluminium composite material (ACM) that helped spread the fire that claimed 72 lives at Grenfell."
 
Sponsored Links
From Advice Note 22 (PDF link in previous post)

3.1.For new residential buildings of 18 metres or more (or where building work is carried out on existing buildings of 18 metres or more), the government has introduced a ban on the use of combustible materials in external walls and specified attachments. The ban limits materials to products achieving a classification of Class A1 or A2-s1,d0, which is in line with classifications applied in many other EU member states.

3.2.The Expert Panel is not aware of any HPL panel meeting this classification
and therefore these should not be used in the external wall when carrying out building works on new residential buildings of 18m or more (i.e. new build, refurbishment of the external wall or a material change of use).






"the government has introduced a ban on the use of combustible materials in external walls and specified attachments."

not before time.
 
Whatever you do JD, dont take up cooking. You seem adept at taking lots of ingredients to make one thing that should look great, say a sponge cake, and end up coming out with a convoluted hotch-potch of a stew. And you dont do the washing up afterwards, leaving the mess for someone else to clear up.
 
Whatever you do JD, dont take up cooking. You seem adept at taking lots of ingredients to make one thing that should look great, say a sponge cake, and end up coming out with a convoluted hotch-potch of a stew. And you dont do the washing up afterwards, leaving the mess for someone else to clear up.

You've just described Brexit. Take some myths and run with them and then leave others to deal with the eventual mess. (y)
 
Sponsored Links
https://www.ft.com/content/0b550210-0bb9-11ea-bb52-34c8d9dc6d84

A widely used cladding, known as high-pressure laminate, is at least as flammable as the type targeted by a UK government safety programme after the Grenfell Tower disaster, a new independent study has found. Researchers from Imperial College London and Warsaw’s Building Research Institute found that HPL cladding failed fire safety tests 80 per cent of the time, while the category of cladding similar to that blamed for the rapid spread of the catastrophic fire at Grenfell failed 60 per cent of the time. The two types of cladding were the most flammable categories assessed by researchers in the most comprehensive study to date.
 
Bring back the old concrete panel clad towers....

OH hang on, they are still there - certainly in Rochdale. :)
 
Why not just rip the cladding off and leave it at that?

The building will be cold and hard to heat.
Saving energy is the No1 priority to save the planet. We could just go back to using asbestos insulation.
 
The building will be cold and hard to heat.
Saving energy is the No1 priority to save the planet. We could just go back to using asbestos insulation.

Ryler hasnt heard of rockwall insulation.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top