Asians

Status
Not open for further replies.
david and julie said:
Why are you only interested in this type of lawbreaking. Why all the "enough" "enough" shouting about it. People get killed on the roads by fools all the time, large companys avoid tax by hiring accountants who are smarter than the Inland Revenue which represents much greater loss than illegal workers, there's routine assault and disorder through excess drink and no one does a thing, car crimes have never been higher, gun crime, drug offences and organised crime are all on the increase why the obssesion with illegal immigrants

Got any figures to back up your assertion regarding company tax fiddling and illegal immigrants? By definition we don't know how many illegals there are so how can a costing be put on their presence?



Tax avoidance is a legitimate exercise, facts are we urgently need a flat tax or similar. If the privateer accountants are running rings around the people who helped form the rules then it speaks volumes about the quality of the public bodies.

I don't recall reading that anyone was "only" interested in any particular crime, Joe just happened to name a few that concern him, he never said they were the only ones. Of course he doesn't agree with the crimes you mention.

Why don't you people answer the sensible and non emotive question which was posed earlier.That is, at what point do we become full and close the doors to this influx?


Frankly it's a dumb question.

I said in my first post on this that the uk is already full, although the government don't think so. They permit immigration for two reasons. Firstly to comply with EEC regs which I totally disagree with and secondly because of a perceived labour shortage, rightly or wrongly I don't know.

Oxfam estimate about $50 billion per annum is lost through off shore tax schemes alone. Go to their web site. You can split hairs as to whether this is avoidance or evasion, either way the loss of revenue to the public dwarfs any thing illegals do.

the point I am making is that all this gets ignored as do other far bigger issues like the continuing daily carnage on our roads, but illegal immigration doesn't, partly through media distortion and partly through racist attitudes. The posts on this subject here are typical of peoples attitudes to this in that it clearly sits at the front of their minds when the issues that actually matter and are costing us money and lives are ignored and tolerated

Whats the bigger issue, the $50 billion tax lost and the average 3,500 people killed and 33,500 maimed on the roads every year or the fact that people are here illegally working. I know what frightens me when my kids leave for school.

Most illegals are doing stuff no one else does any way, just like black immigrants in the 50's brought here to work on the railways and transport because white folk didn't want to get their hands dirty anymore. Their doing all the c**p jobs no one wants, gutting chickens, cleaning fish, filling skips and all the rest of it. The chinese workers drowned in Morecambe bay are a good example, I don't see any desperate anglo saxons willing to risk their necks in the pitch black with the tide coming in.

No one wants to pay more than they have to for anything and thats why there is a ready source of employers for these people. Basic supply and demand, it's a capitalist society and thats what you get, personally I accept it as part of the basic economic nature of our society. It's an unavoidable evil

There is a problem with illegal immigration but it's not what really matters, it's what people want to matter because its easy, they can talk about them and us and "race wars" and look down their nose at them and talk about deportation and all the rubbish that goes with it

What will actually cause people a problem won't be an illegal immigrant it' s most likely to be a white p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours, but nobody gets up in arms about that or threatens arson attacks like they do with illegal immigrants

Why not, the reason is simple they are at best uninformed and at worst racist fools and hypocrites who don't understand how this countrys economy works or what actually matters to them.

I don't know whats in yours or Joe-90s head but I am pretty sure you are not up in arms about any of the things iv'e mentioned here. There won't be a new thread about licensing hours or any impassioned posts about road traffic deaths or alcohol abuse but their might well be one whining about speed cameras or some ethnic minority or other

I assume any one who posts here is a reasonable human being so as far as I am concerned all of these apparently obsessive posts on the subject of race which pop up on this board and then degenerate into slanging matches are just unfortunate, not the work of racists

If you step back from the issue and think about it perhaps it's time people had another look at their priorities
 
Sponsored Links
Pickles. If you'd been in the forum longer you would know that I am against speeding, drinking and smoking. Smoking kills 120,000 per year in the UK.

I would like all of those issues erradicated.

However, this isn't a thread about smoking or speeding.

If you want to talk about those issues then start a thread and I'll agree with you that they should be erradicated.

What I'm talking about in this thread is that 1 in 50 of our population is now an illegal immigrant.

Where does it end? Juat because smoking kills more than they do does that in some way justify that fact? It might in your head but not in mine.

The real problems will come in a few years time when the economy slips into recession (a mathmatical certainty).

As for immigrants doing the crap jobs like fish gutting - we have unemployed of our own. Why import a worker if we have our own sitting idle. Starvation would soon give them a change of heart.

You seem to be suggesting that you understand economics but from what I've seen so far you are clueless.



joe
 
Ban-all-sheds. I've asked you a question. At least have the courtesy to reply.

That question is:

It is estimated that one-in-fifty of our population are illegal immigrants or failed asylum seekers. At what ratio will you say "ENOUGH"? 1 in 40? 1 in 20? 1 in 5? Let me hear your answer to that question. (he won't answer).


joe
 
joe-90 said:
Ban-all-sheds. I've asked you a question. At least have the courtesy to reply.

ban-all-sheds said:
Anyway - this is all getting very tedious.

Whilst I'm happy to debate the topic with others, I really don't see the point in carrying on a dialogue with either joe-90 or slogger on this.
 
Sponsored Links
ban-all-sheds said:
joe-90 said:
Ban-all-sheds. I've asked you a question. At least have the courtesy to reply.

ban-all-sheds said:
Anyway - this is all getting very tedious.

Whilst I'm happy to debate the topic with others, I really don't see the point in carrying on a dialogue with either joe-90 or slogger on this.

/quote]


In other words you will not answer because you cannot answer.

You have no answers.

You are a limp-wristed hand-wringing liberal unable to answer without shattering your dearly held (but unworkable) ideology.

Come join us in the real world.


joe
 
In other words you will not answer because you have no answer.

This is the difference between a hand-wringing liberal (you) and a pragmatist (me).

I will answer any question you ask of me, whether it be hypothectical or real-life. Real life problems need real life answers.

Now run off and start 'wringing' there's a good chap.


joe
 
news.yawn.jpg
 
Richardp said:

Hey up, 'chucking out' time at the New Inn then or was that 'up' ? :D

Getting colder in Somerset by the hour ... brr! :D
 
Yes it is a yawn when the liberals attempt a debate. They lose every time - and they've just lost yet again.



joe
 
pickles, your post above is factually devious, furthermore reverse racism is as deplorable as racism itself.

You have selectively quoted and misused an Oxfam estimate concerning global tax issues and then used it in a totally separate debate about UK immigration. Furthermore that report appears to concentrate on the problems of development aid rather than immigration. I would guess that the most blatant racist would prefer to end tax evasion, if it meant more money being spent in the poor regions, if nothing else it may stop some of them coming here. Which is clearly what a racist (and a realist) would want.

You also commented on evasion V avoidance and splitting hairs when the report says this,
We stress that the estimate is a conservative one. It is derived from the effects of tax competition and the non-payment of tax on flight capital. It does not take into account outright tax evasion,
which clearly places your hair splitting comment into perspective.
Unlike you I am not biased so will link the report for all to read.
http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/debt_aid/tax_havens.htm

What will actually cause people a problem won't be an illegal immigrant it' s most likely to be a white p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours, but nobody gets up in arms about that or threatens arson attacks like they do with illegal immigrants

Tell me pickles which of these quotes is racist?

It's most likely to be a white p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours.
It's most likely to be a black p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours.

You also said,
Why not, the reason is simple they are at best uninformed and at worst racist fools and hypocrites who don't understand how this countrys economy works or what actually matters to them.
In reply to me and you clearly call an uninformed racist fool and hypocrite. Here is my post again, could you kindly point out the racist elements contained in it?
Got any figures to back up your assertion regarding company tax fiddling and illegal immigrants? By definition we don't know how many illegals there are so how can a costing be put on their presence?

Tax avoidance is a legitimate exercise, facts are we urgently need a flat tax or similar. If the privateer accountants are running rings around the people who helped form the rules then it speaks volumes about the quality of the public bodies.

I don't recall reading that anyone was "only" interested in any particular crime, Joe just happened to name a few that concern him, he never said they were the only ones. Of course he doesn't agree with the crimes you mention.

Why don't you people answer the sensible and non emotive question which was posed earlier.That is, at what point do we become full and close the doors to this influx?

Talking about racist fools (racist as in towards white company car drivers)the crimes you mention are not race crimes, they are crimes which are committed irrespective of colour. Besides, whilst mentioning Oxfam you have ignored the other half of the question. Have you got any figures(either economic or social) on the true cost of immigration (illegal or otherwise and regardless of colour) to the ever more concerned indigenous population?

btw, I thought the cockle pickers were employed by there own? people and the people from Morecambe don't want anyone except themselves picking the cockles, irrespective of where they come from or their colour. They don't even want born in the UK people there and there is no shortage of people willing to do this work.

When does the UK become full and close the doors?
 
notb665 said:
Why are Asian-sub-continent football players under represented in professional football in this country?

Um, ah, this was the thread ... or was it?

:D
 
No! you misunderstand me, this is a picture of a famous Asian footballer :LOL:
ok joe, sorry mate, only being playful.
 
david and julie said:
pickles, your post above is factually devious, furthermore reverse racism is as deplorable as racism itself.

You have selectively quoted and misused an Oxfam estimate concerning global tax issues and then used it in a totally separate debate about UK immigration. Furthermore that report appears to concentrate on the problems of development aid rather than immigration. I would guess that the most blatant racist would prefer to end tax evasion, if it meant more money being spent in the poor regions, if nothing else it may stop some of them coming here. Which is clearly what a racist (and a realist) would want.

You also commented on evasion V avoidance and splitting hairs when the report says this,
We stress that the estimate is a conservative one. It is derived from the effects of tax competition and the non-payment of tax on flight capital. It does not take into account outright tax evasion,
which clearly places your hair splitting comment into perspective.
Unlike you I am not biased so will link the report for all to read.
http://www.oxfam.org.uk/what_we_do/issues/debt_aid/tax_havens.htm

What will actually cause people a problem won't be an illegal immigrant it' s most likely to be a white p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours, but nobody gets up in arms about that or threatens arson attacks like they do with illegal immigrants

Tell me pickles which of these quotes is racist?

It's most likely to be a white p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours.
It's most likely to be a black p**s artist in a company car who kills or maims you or yours.

You also said,
Why not, the reason is simple they are at best uninformed and at worst racist fools and hypocrites who don't understand how this countrys economy works or what actually matters to them.
In reply to me and you clearly call an uninformed racist fool and hypocrite. Here is my post again, could you kindly point out the racist elements contained in it?
Got any figures to back up your assertion regarding company tax fiddling and illegal immigrants? By definition we don't know how many illegals there are so how can a costing be put on their presence?

Tax avoidance is a legitimate exercise, facts are we urgently need a flat tax or similar. If the privateer accountants are running rings around the people who helped form the rules then it speaks volumes about the quality of the public bodies.

I don't recall reading that anyone was "only" interested in any particular crime, Joe just happened to name a few that concern him, he never said they were the only ones. Of course he doesn't agree with the crimes you mention.

Why don't you people answer the sensible and non emotive question which was posed earlier.That is, at what point do we become full and close the doors to this influx?

Talking about racist fools (racist as in towards white company car drivers)the crimes you mention are not race crimes, they are crimes which are committed irrespective of colour. Besides, whilst mentioning Oxfam you have ignored the other half of the question. Have you got any figures(either economic or social) on the true cost of immigration (illegal or otherwise and regardless of colour) to the ever more concerned indigenous population?

btw, I thought the cockle pickers were employed by there own? people and the people from Morecambe don't want anyone except themselves picking the cockles, irrespective of where they come from or their colour. They don't even want born in the UK people there and there is no shortage of people willing to do this work.

When does the UK become full and close the doors?



Iv'e made my point though haven't I we can see what floats your boat and gets the stroppy posting going................ race
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top