At what point are we 'old'?

Sponsored Links
The Boomer generation which are now mostly retired enjoying index linked final salary pensions really had the best deal. Their retirement benefits were designed around life expectancy that assumed they'd get 5-10 years as a pensioner before croaking it. All these companies have to pay the bill and that gets passed on to consumers. The boomers also enjoyed house prices roughly 3 times their annual salary when they started out. A young person today would be lucky to find a place at 10X their annual salary and the only pension they will get is one they pay in to.

But we can't blame the previous generation for global warming etc. The problem we have is our population is growing and our economy is based on that happening. The best solution to global warming is to reduce the number of humans on the planet and automate more of the functions that need humans. The planet may then have a chance to recover before the sun burns us up or a meteor destroys us.
 
Sponsored Links
The Boomer generation which are now mostly retired enjoying index linked final salary pensions really had the best deal
Are they really? And @JohnD talks about prejuduce? It may interest you to know that there are millions of boomers who didn't retire on index linked final salary pensions (generally a middle-class white collar perk), so maybe a bit more thought and a bit less bigotry is in order. Not everyone is middle-class

Also many working class people don't have a long retirement, although 15 or so years seems a lot more likely than 5 these days

Speaking as someone who was not on the white collar gravy train
 
The best solution to global warming is to reduce the number of humans on the planet and automate more of the functions that need humans.

Starting with the ones who have the greatest per-head usage of energy and resources, surely.
 
The functions which need the most humans are generally the ones requiring the greatest number of low skill, low pay workers, surely?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Interestingly, Sir David of Attenbrough agrees -

The Optimum Population Trust agrees with Migration Watch. One of its patrons, Sir David Attenborough, states on its website: “All our environmental problems become easier to solve with fewer people, and harder - and ultimately impossible - to solve with ever more people.” In a report published in July 2010 it claimed that the United Kingdom was "overpopulated by forty-five million people" and advocated that couples should only have two children, that immigration should never exceed emigration, and that the population should be reduced by at least a quarter of a per cent per year." (39)
 
it claimed that the United Kingdom was "overpopulated by forty-five million people"

Who will volunteer to be culled?

Start with Attenborough, his children and grandchildren?
 
Can we start another war with the French (scoundrels)?
No?
Okay, well i'm out of ideas.
 
In the third world, the education of girls and availability of reliable contraception are the most effective means of reducing population growth.

China and Europe now have a depopulation problem. As does Russia.
 
You know you are getting older when you spend 5 minutes looking for your glasses before you realise that you are wearing them.
 
The problem we have is our population is growing and our economy is based on that happening. The best solution to global warming is to reduce the number of humans on the planet and automate more of the functions that need humans. The planet may then have a chance to recover before the sun burns us up or a meteor destroys us.

I've always said the white elephant in the room is overpopulation. Perhaps another issue just as bad is distribution of population (i.e. population density).
 
Funnily enough...

"Prince Philip said that he would like to be reincarnated as a deadly virus as a form of revenge against human overpopulation"

The jab junkies seem to disagree!
 
Interestingly, Sir David of Attenbrough agrees -

The Optimum Population Trust agrees with Migration Watch. One of its patrons, Sir David Attenborough, states on its website: “All our environmental problems become easier to solve with fewer people, and harder - and ultimately impossible - to solve with ever more people.” In a report published in July 2010 it claimed that the United Kingdom was "overpopulated by forty-five million people" and advocated that couples should only have two children, that immigration should never exceed emigration, and that the population should be reduced by at least a quarter of a per cent per year." (39)
Is there correlation between population and poverty.
People on average, are wealthier today than they were in the past, even though population levels were a lot lower.

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top