Bame people

[JohnD]

everyone

everyone?

 

[durhamplumber]

A colonial power that is simply interested in ravaging the natural resources

Why did India not rip up all its railways If colonialism was so bad..(UK built)..And they want no reminders of it

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Why did India not rip up all its railways If colonialism was so bad..(UK built)..And they want no reminders of it

I would estimate that up to 50,000,000 died in famines in India, caused or exacerbated by British Rule.
https://yourstory.com/2014/08/bengal-famine-genocide#:~:text=Under the British Raj, India,1897 and lastly 1943-44.&text=The first signs indicating the,itself went on till 1773.

This is a timeline of major famines on the Indian subcontinent during British rule from 1765 to 1947.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule​

Some legacy, eh?
Kinda makes Hitler look saintly in comparison.
And we haven't touched on the wealth appropriated by British Rule.

 

[durhamplumber]

I would estimate about 20,000,000 died in famines in India, caused or exacerbated by British Rule.
https://yourstory.com/2014/08/bengal-famine-genocide#:~:text=Under the British Raj, India,1897 and lastly 1943-44.&text=The first signs indicating the,itself went on till 1773.

This is a timeline of major famines on the Indian subcontinent during British rule from 1765 to 1947.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule​

Some legacy, eh?
And we haven't touched on the wealth appropriated by British Rule.

Why not rip the rails up then?

 

[durhamplumber]

I would estimate about 20,000,000 died in famines in India, caused or exacerbated by British Rule.

LMAOooooooooo......

 

[dontbelieveawordofit]

Ever considered that it might not be everyone else that's unreasonable?

for him, that would be unreasonable

 

[durhamplumber]

I would estimate that up to 50,000,000 died in famines in India, caused or exacerbated by British Rule.
https://yourstory.com/2014/08/bengal-famine-genocide#:~:text=Under the British Raj, India,1897 and lastly 1943-44.&text=The first signs indicating the,itself went on till 1773.

This is a timeline of major famines on the Indian subcontinent during British rule from 1765 to 1947.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule​

Some legacy, eh?
Kinda makes Hitler look saintly in comparison.
And we haven't touched on the wealth appropriated by British Rule.

Fek me...from 20Mto 50Million in 2 mins...you do talk utter nonsense Razzle..pluck another number,you are on a roll

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

LMAOooooooooo......

You might think it's funny that up to 50,000,000 Indians dies during famines during British Rule, caused or exacerbated by those British Rulers.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Fek me...from 20Mto 50Million in 2 mins...you do talk utter nonsense Razzle..pluck another number you are on a roll

Fat finger excuse, like Motties.

Check out the history for yourself. You will notice I provided a link to the history of famines in India during British Rule.

 

[durhamplumber]

Fat finger excuse, like Motties.

Yeah..right...""lie til ya die"".top lad..sounds better than """I am just making shiìte up because I hate UK""

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Yeah..right...""lie til ya die"".top lad

Check out the history for yourself, if you dare, instead of accusing people of lying without checking out the history.
Of course you could do what you normally do and deny everything out of hand.

 

[mitch66]

everyone?

Yes that was my question Himmi. Have you answered with the wrong account?

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

""I am just making shiìte up because I hate UK""

Just for you durhamplumber,
1769 - 70 10,000,000
1783 - 84 11,000,000
1791 - 92 11,000,000
1837 - 38 800,000
1860 - 61 2,000,000
1865 - 67 1,000,000
1868 - 70 1,500,000
1876 - 78 ~8,000,000
1896 - 97 ~14,000,000
1899 - 1900 ~7,000,000
1943 - 44 3,000,000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule

Total ~70,000,000

You can close your eyes, durhamplumber, and pretend it didn't happen, but it did and it doesn't appear much in the history taught in schools.

Don't forget, British were taking their 'taxes' from working Indians to pay for the infrastructure in India. Except when it came to famine, there was no such infrastructure as it had existed prior to British Rule.

 

[durhamplumber]

Just for you durhamplumber,
1769 - 70 10,000,000
1783 - 84 11,000,000
1791 - 92 11,000,000
1837 - 38 800,000
1860 - 61 2,000,000
1865 - 67 1,000,000
1868 - 70 1,500,000
1876 - 78 ~8,000,000
1896 - 97 ~14,000,000
1899 - 1900 ~7,000,000
1943 - 44 3,000,000
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule

Total ~70,000,000

You can close your eyes, durhamplumber, and pretend it didn't happen, but it did and it doesn't appear much in the history taught in schools.

Don't forget, British were taking their 'taxes' from working Indians to pay for the infrastructure in India. Except when it came to famine, there was no such infrastructure as it had existed prior to British Rule.

20.50.70Million....no limit to your clown behaviour.

 

[durhamplumber]

.