BBC news Black out

[aveatry]

Which special interest group is most interested in Steveo beyond any other topic? The headline is all about what the editors think will drawn in their target market most, the BBC aren't dedicated to drawing in the alt right.

Explain this then

 

[jono_h]

Well Strictly isn't on today so they had a spare slot on the Home page.

 

[Notch7]

Here's another one you wont find on the BBC news website main landing page.
"Labour MP 'sucker-punched' constituent before beating him six times after being 'intimidated' in late-night row"

Aveatry, why are you so intent on making yourself look Silly?

 

[Notch7]

Explain this then
View attachment 360834

No doubt there are idiots busy trying to claim "the establishment" are trying to silence little Tommy Ten names.

It's obviously a globalist WEF plot.

I bet George Soros is behind it, oh and Bill Gates.

 

[aveatry]

Aveatry, why are you so intent on making yourself look Silly?

What's the point in referring to something that happened yesterday. At the time of posting YESTERDAY it was not there

 

[aveatry]

No doubt there are idiots busy trying to claim "the establishment" are trying to silence little Tommy Ten names.
It's obviously a globalist WEF plot.
I bet George Soros is behind it, oh and Bill Gates.

If that is what you think - then you have lost the plot.

 

[amfisted]

That GB news consumers are generally right wing extremists?

Not actually true. Any rational and neutral person who takes the time and trouble to watch the channel--rather than swallowing the narrative peddled by the left wing glove puppets whose sole ambition in life is to shut it down--will notice that in almost all their live discussions they have representation from both left and right. Sometimes the middle too. Ok, their Facebook group is something else altogether and not notable for the sophistication of its' members political analysis, but that's not the official face of the channel.

Like others, I find it useful to check various news sites and come to conclusions based on a range of evidence.

 

[aveatry]

Not actually true. Any rational and neutral person who takes the time and trouble to watch the channel--rather than swallowing the narrative peddled by the left wing glove puppets whose sole ambition in life is to shut it down--will notice that in almost all their live discussions they have representation from both left and right. Sometimes the middle too. Ok, their Facebook group is something else altogether and not notable for the sophistication of its' members political analysis, but that's not the official face of the channel.

Like others, I find it useful to check various news sites and come to conclusions based on a range of evidence.

But there are some who only want 1 line of news to be fed to people.

 

[amfisted]

But there are some who only want 1 line of news to be fed to people.

Well, they’re proper silly billies, in my humble opinion.

 

[IT Minion]

Not actually true. Any rational and neutral person who takes the time and trouble to watch the channel-

That's not backed up by viewing figures. It's a very niche viewing audience. It's got half the reach of Cebeebies.

Who Watches GB News?

The launch of GB News in the summer of 2021 was the biggest shake-up of the British TV news media market since the launch of Rupert Murdoch’s Sky News in 1989.

redfieldandwiltonstrategies.com

It's also an unreliable source of news. I believe It has been sanctioned by Ofcom more than any other channel since it was launched. Including misinformation and a lack of neutrality.

 

[noseall]

Odd though then that they kept 100,000 people marching off the main page but then this is how the BBC dealt with Lenon in court -you know "that not terribly interesting to most people" person

View attachment 360831

Yay!

 

[noseall]

Not actually true. Any rational and neutral person who takes the time and trouble to watch the channel--rather than swallowing the narrative peddled by the left wing glove puppets whose sole ambition in life is to shut it down--will notice that in almost all their live discussions they have representation from both left and right. Sometimes the middle too. Ok, their Facebook group is something else altogether and not notable for the sophistication of its' members political analysis, but that's not the official face of the channel.

Like others, I find it useful to check various news sites and come to conclusions based on a range of evidence.

Lol.

Meanwhile, their impartial and fair coverage trophy cabinet, remains empty.

 

[noseall]

the left wing glove puppets whose sole ambition in life is to shut it down

Who are these left wing glove puppets you speak of?

 

[JohnD]

100,000 people

Where did you get that number?

 

[amfisted]

Lol.

Meanwhile, their impartial and fair coverage trophy cabinet, remains empty.

In your opinion. Sorry, I forgot the Lol.