That last line says it all. “NoMeanwhile, their complaints box is running on full.
Opinion my arse.
Opinion matters except mine”. Pathetic.
That last line says it all. “NoMeanwhile, their complaints box is running on full.
Opinion my arse.
Lets have some then - I am interested in expanding my news source.
No.You think that there should be just one source of news:
Not at all. GBNews can put out as much disinformation as they please. But don't be surprised when folk rip it to shreds. Incidentally, the last opinion based right wing channel of note, has lost hundreds of millions, blurting bullshít, to the needy. That famous line 'the election was stolen' has cost the idiots that repeat it over a BILLION dollars and still counting.. “No
Opinion matters except mine
FACT.Meanwhile, their complaints box is running on full.
That it's supporters dont see this, just shows how they are fed what they want .No.
GBNews ironically, is not a 'news' channel. It's mostly opinion based on current affairs/events.
Why bother with the truth from say the BBC or Sky News when you can be soothed with right wing lies.That it's supporters dont see this, just shows how they are fed what they want .
How many of the complaints that they've investigated have been rejected as not being soundly based?It has been sanctioned and faces more sanctions. Two things to say about that: one, Ofcom has been flooded with complaints about GBN that it has to investigate, even if they have no sound basis, and is struggling with that task. Two, if there is misinformation and a lack of neutrality then my advice is to reach for the Off button and all will be well. Incidentally, GBNs viewing figures matter little when it’s bankrolled by at least one billionaire.
For once I'd agree with you. It features political discussion programmes with panels who discuss the news, features focused on current news items, and news bulletins. Its never pretended to be anything else, except in its billing title. And as I said above, by no means do all of the commentators express what you call "RW" opinion.No.
GBNews ironically, is not a 'news' channel. It's mostly (RW) opinion based on current affairs/events.
Not at all. GBNews can put out as much disinformation as they please. But don't be surprised when folk rip it to shreds. Incidentally, the last opinion based right wing channel of note, has lost hundreds of millions, blurting bullshít, to the needy. That famous line 'the election was stolen' has cost the idiots that repeat it over a BILLION dollars and still counting.
Dumb RWR.
You would be wise to fact check what you hear on GBnews….And I for one prefer a diverse range of opinions
When I say “diverse”, by the way, implicit in that statement is my understanding that not all parallel opinions on any particular subject can simultaneously be construed as fact.You would be wise to fact check what you hear on GBnews….
Unfortunately GBnews is not a terribly reliable source.
- Overall, we rate GB News Right Biased and Questionable based on a lack of transparency with ownership and funding, numerous failed fact checks, and the promotion of conspiracy theories and pseudoscience.
GB News UK - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
You might wonder why GBnews pushes climate change myths and misinformation
GB News Owner’s Hedge Fund Has $2.2 Billion Fossil Fuel Investments
The broadcaster has regularly platformed climate science denial and attacks on net zero since it launched in 2021.
GB News Owner’s Hedge Fund Has $2.2 Billion Fossil Fuel Investments
One of the owners of GB News runs a hedge fund that has a major financial stake in more than 100 oil and gas firms, DeSmog can reveal. This news comes after former prime minister Boris Johnson was announced as a new presenter on the television broadcaster on Friday. An investigation by DeSmog...www.desmog.com
That's a lot of words to say GBNews is mainly RW bullshít.is my understanding that not all parallel opinions on any particular subject can simultaneously be construed as fact.
Who are the silencers you speak of? Please be specific and not some oft repeated trope - please?the book-burning left uses to try to silence those who don't unconditionally accept their narrative