BBC news Black out

Who are these left wing glove puppets you speak of?
Those who promote and pursue a narrative without properly investigating its truth, because they want to be embraced within an echo chamber. For the sake of balance I’d add that the right has them too.
 
Sponsored Links
That's not backed up by viewing figures. It's a very niche viewing audience. It's got half the reach of Cebeebies.


It's also an unreliable source of news. I believe It has been sanctioned by Ofcom more than any other channel since it was launched. Including misinformation and a lack of neutrality.
It has been sanctioned and faces more sanctions. Two things to say about that: one, Ofcom has been flooded with complaints about GBN that it has to investigate, even if they have no sound basis, and is struggling with that task. Two, if there is misinformation and a lack of neutrality then my advice is to reach for the Off button and all will be well. Incidentally, GBNs viewing figures matter little when it’s bankrolled by at least one billionaire.
 
Those who promote and pursue a narrative without properly investigating its truth, because they want to be embraced within an echo chamber. For the sake of balance I’d add that the right has them too.
Imaginary. Thought as much.

GBNews, ffs. :rolleyes:
 
Sponsored Links
Imaginary. Thought as much.

GBNews, ffs. :rolleyes:
So you think everyone who detests/resents/ gets ridiculously angry about GBN, even if they’ve never watched it (but because someone else told them how utterly beastly it is) can be regarded as an unimpeachable harbinger of truth? FFS back at yer,
 
So you think everyone who detests/resents/ gets ridiculously angry about GBN, even if they’ve never watched it (but because someone else told them how utterly beastly it is) can be regarded as an unimpeachable harbinger of truth?
No Idea. What made you say that?

I think GBNews is a non-serious TV channel, which is there simply to feed the needy. It places itself firmly in the Fox style fantasy bracket. You know the one that lost 3/4 of a BILLION dollars fomenting right wing lies.
 
It has been sanctioned and faces more sanctions. Two things to say about that: one, Ofcom has been flooded with complaints about GBN that it has to investigate, even if they have no sound basis, and is struggling with that task. Two, if there is misinformation and a lack of neutrality then my advice is to reach for the Off button and all will be well. Incidentally, GBNs viewing figures matter little when it’s bankrolled by at least one billionaire.
That should tell you something
 
But there are some who only want 1 line of news to be fed to people.
Daily Wail readers nailed on. It's the reason why Wail stories have the contradictory and little truthful bits, right at the end. They know the average Wail reader will see the headline and possibly the initial bold bit at the beginning.

Shmucks.
 
No Idea. What made you say that?

I think GBNews is a non-serious TV channel, which is there simply to feed the needy. It places itself firmly in the Fox style fantasy bracket. You know the one that lost 3/4 of a BILLION dollars fomenting right wing lies.
You think that there should be just one source of news: I get that. One that promotes the happy clappy, multiculti view of today’s Britain. One where all immigration is good, whether legal or not, and where anyone who disagrees should shut up and go and live in a bucket. And it hurts that some people won’t accept that narrative and just go away rather than have access to a channel that says something else. Now I’d love to talk further but I know that folks like you can’t sleep if you don’t get the last word.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top