Biased Mod's post removed,, hmmm

[jasonzyx]

If the thread is deleted, would it be because of the abuse contained within the thread?
Where would that abuse originate from?

 

[Notch7]

Notch, "I painted the original Mona Lisa."
Me, "Where is the proof? "
Notch, "It is above, look for yourself."

Such is the logic that defies commonsense.

eh?

its written clearly in a post above.

 

[sodthisforfun]

If you want to deny that there is sufficient proof that there is only one human race, that there is an insignificant difference in genes between ethnicities to support the idea that there are more than one human race, that is entirely up to you.

Yay, another thread by Himmy turned into what he wants - to lord it over! I guess he has to, the other one got locked.

 

[Notch7]

If the thread is deleted, would it be because of the abuse contained within the thread?
Where would that abuse originate from?

You.

Calling people racist without proof.

that is abusive.

And it is unacceptable.

nobody has been abusive to you

 

[sodthisforfun]

Notch, "I painted the original Mona Lisa."
Me, "Where is the proof? "
Notch, "It is above, look for yourself."

Such is the logic that defies commonsense.

Do you need to be spoon fed? Here in a nutshell is you trying to lord it over. Be a grown up and look for yourself.

 

[jasonzyx]

If there is an insignificant difference in the genes, then why do different populations, races call it what you like are prone to diseases at different rates.

Difference in genes! It doesn't make them different races.
If my family has a history of diabetes, it doesn't make my family a different race from a family that does not have such a history.
If you think it does, you are welcome to your ridiculous ideas.

And where is your proof that a person that thinks the human race is comprised of more than one race automatically a racist.

The essentialist philosophy is fundamentally racist. There is the proof.

 

[sodthisforfun]

You.

Calling people racist without proof.

that is abusive.

And it is unacceptable.

nobody has been abusive to you

Was it you that said he is unable to tell the difference between criticism and abuse? I can't remember, but it was better worded.

 

[jasonzyx]

eh?

its written clearly in a post above.

Show us.
Reproduce that post.

 

[sodthisforfun]

Show us.
Reproduce that post.

Look for yourself. Be an adult.

 

[Notch7]

The essentialist philosophy is fundamentally racist. There is the proof.

Thats your opinion.

not fact

no proof

 

[Notch7]

If you think it does, you are welcome to your ridiculous ideas.

not my ideas.

Its what scientists say.

Is that apology close?

It must be

 

[jasonzyx]

You.

Calling people racist without proof.

that is abusive.

And it is unacceptable.

nobody has been abusive to you

Is it abusive to describe an untidy person as untidy? Or is that a reasonably accurate description?
Is it abusive to describe an aggressive person as aggressive? Or is that a reasonably accurate description?
Is it abusive to describe a drunken person as drunken? Or is that a reasonably accurate description?

Is it not acceptable to apply accurate descriptions to people?

 

[jasonzyx]

not my ideas.

Its what scientists say.

Is that apology close?

It must be

It is your interpretation of what scientists say.
You are not unknown for distorting others' comments.

You are now known for claiming that you have said something, but clearly haven't, and cannot reproduce what you claim to have said.

 

[Notch7]

Is it not acceptable to apply accurate descriptions to people?

Yes

So dont call people racist without proof.

 

[jasonzyx]

Yes

So dont call people racist without proof.

You think it is unacceptable to apply accurate descriptions to people?
Really?
I have provided proof numerous times of those people being racist, who i describe as being racist.
To ascribe to the philosophy that there are different races within the human race is inherently and fundamentally racist.
If you deny that, it is your opinion, and merely because you want to avoid the label of racist, not because you have any scientific proof that your theory is accurate.