Biased Mod's post removed,, hmmm

[sodthisforfun]

You think it is unacceptable to apply accurate descriptions to people?
Really?
I have provided proof numerous time of those people being racist, who i describe as being racist.
To ascribe to the philosophy that there are different races within the human race is inherently and fundamentally racist.

In my and EFL's case, you have given no proof of racism. Just your opinion.

 

[Notch7]

I have provided proof numerous times of those people being racist, who i describe as being racist.
To ascribe to the philosophy that there are different races within the human race is inherently and fundamentally racist.
If you deny that, it is your opinion, and merely because you want to avoid the label of racist, not because you have any scientific proof that your theory is accurate

you have provided no proof.

It is only your opinion.

 

[Brigadier]

If you want to deny that there is sufficient proof that there is only one human race, that there is an insignificant difference in genes between ethnicities to support the idea that there are more than one human race............

How many separately-recognised "ethnicities" are there?

 

[jasonzyx]

In my and EFL's case, you have given no proof of racism. Just your opinion.

you have provided no proof.

It is only your opinion.

I have provided proof multiple times, you just claim that I haven't, which is nonsense and a distortion of the fact.
I will provide it again:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/23557192?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

And then round and around we go again.........
It doesn't matter haw many times you go around, you still cannot provide scientific proof that there are different races within the human race, (without distorting the evidence) and you still refuse or are unable to provide your interpretation of racism.

 

[jasonzyx]

How many separately-recognised "ethnicities" are there?

Totally irrelevant and a diversion.
But there are many different ideas.
Try looking at a few official forms and ask yourself why do they not all have the same number of ethnicities as multiple choices. (NB, they do not ask what race do we classify ourselves as, but what ethnicity.)

Alternatively try google.

 

[Notch7]

I have provided proof multiple times, you just claim that I haven't, which is nonsense and a distortion of the fact.
I will provide it again:

Thank you for providing it again, it still doesnt provide any proof.

Where does it say that if you believe there is more than 1 human race you must be a racist.
Please highlight the bit where you think it does.

 

[sodthisforfun]

I have provided proof multiple times, you just claim that I haven't, which is nonsense and a distortion of the fact.
I will provide it again:
View attachment 160424
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23557192?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

And then round and around we go again.........
It doesn't matter haw many times you go around, you still cannot provide scientific proof that there are different races within the human race, (without distorting the evidence) and you still refuse or are unable to provide your interpretation of racism.

Yes, around and around.
That, by the way isn't proof I am a racist, it's your opinion. All I have ever talked about is the common use of the word.

Anyway, by using your logic, when people talk about race and therefore they must be racist, I think it's best if you tell these people that they are inherently racist while talking about themselves because they used the word 'race' in a traditional, well known and understood sense. Well, all except MJ of course, being dead and all. Who knew that he was a racist AND a kiddy fiddler? Wow.

 

[jasonzyx]

Yes, around and around.
That, by the way isn't proof I am a racist, it's your opinion. All I have ever talked about is the common use of the word.

Anyway, by using your logic, when people talk about race and therefore they must be racist, I think it's best if you tell these people that they are inherently racist while talking about themselves because they used the word 'race' in a traditional, well known and understood sense. Well, all except MJ of course, being dead and all. Who knew that he was a racist AND a kiddy fiddler? Wow.

View attachment 160426 View attachment 160427 View attachment 160428

Dear God!
Around and around we go again.
These people probably consider race to be synonymous with ethnicity. Something which EFLimpudence has repeatedly rejected. You have repeatedly agreed with him.
Race is a leftover word from a bygone era. It is now used synonymously with race.

 

[Notch7]

Thank you for providing it again, it still doesnt provide any proof.

Where does it say that if you believe there is more than 1 human race you must be a racist.
Please highlight the bit where you think it does.

no proof forthcoming I see.

 

[jasonzyx]

no proof forthcoming I see.

If you choose to deny the blatantly obvious, that is your choice.
It is not possible to explain the logic of a racist.

 

[SirGalahad]

He should be banned.His hate is infecting the feeble minded,SirGal,,,Lal,, JohnD,,,and especially JAS,,,who is rit under his spell!..BAS reminds me of a nutcase at school who kicked windows out if he did not have his own way..but blamed everyone else..

 

[SirGalahad]

Do you know where the culture of acid attacks originated from?

Lol

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/5d38c003-c54a-4513-a369-f9eae0d52f91

• The suspect was male 74% of the time and victim was male 67% of the time
• Just 6% of suspects were Asian
• Only one so-called ‘honour’ attack was recorded in 15 years
• Four out of five violent offences never reached trial

Never let facts get in the way of your myths and untruths.

 

[SirGalahad]

Tell that to the victims of Blair's policies.

Who are.

What labour did well was invest in health and education. Its one of the best investment a country can make to shift long term GDP.

You can argue PFI was costly and increasing tuition fees and university places was too much.

 

[jasonzyx]

no proof forthcoming I see.

I present an hypothesis, you ask for proof, which I provide, time and time again.
By all scientific approaches, you should present an alternative hypothesis, and discredit the proof I provided, providing proof to substantiate your hypothesis.
That is how it is done.
A mere denial that the proof that I provided is not sufficient will not do. It is not a logical or intelligent approach. It an affront to anyone's commonsense.

 

[SirGalahad]

Yes

So dont call people racist without proof.

Im sure he's trolling.

Liberally calling people racist demeans those who are actually racially abused.