Boris accused of breaking the law again

Sponsored Links
Thread not go how you thought, lost interest now, same old rabbit holes.
 
Sponsored Links
Apparently the cabinet office got given his diaries as they were paying for his legal costs. When they reviewed them they saw what looked like law breaking and they were obliged to report it to the police.

Oh aye. :LOL:
 
There's probably a bit of the same misthinking that happened in the old Spanish flu. They knew it was dangerous, and really easy to transmit, so they kept large groups of soldiers apart.

Officers met to discuss it, ............
soldiers got it from the officers & lots of young men died.

"Don't do as I do, do as I say", is highly pervasive.
 
No doubt they'll be another lengthy inquiry and nothing will come of it...

Stupid people will vote for bojo wherever he decides to stand, so nothing will change!

Funny how other ordinary people were fined up to £10k for 'organising' events in days through a kangaroo court system!
 
Can we skip the boring COVID isn't dangerous rewriting of history in this thread?
Tell that to the government and health officials as they have decided we just have to live with it...

Which is what should have happened in the first place!
 
Apparently the cabinet office got given his diaries as they were paying for his legal costs. When they reviewed them they saw what looked like law breaking and they were obliged to report it to the police.
Then it would seem that there has been an error in ensuring privileged disclosure. Possibly another breach of the code

At least his lawyers are ready to fight this time. I suspect NFA.
 
Last edited:
Can we skip the boring COVID isn't dangerous rewriting of history in this thread?
It was dangerous, just not AS dangerous as portrayed, certainly not to younger people, this was all known from the start. It's entirely possible that the lockdown will have ultimately killed and harmed more people than it saved.

Operations cancelled, educations irreversibly harmed for life, businesses bankrupted, countless other harms. All to save mostly obese coffin-dodgers who probably had a few months left without it anyway.
 
Last edited:
226,196 (so far) didn’t live with it though and it would have been more if not for the vaccine.
Ah, so are you now agreeing that in many cases the figures are 'with' it, not because of it?

Because that is what a reassessment is starting to conclude...

The vaccine(s) were rushed out and there is no evidence as to how many more would have died without whatever one (or multiple ones) were taken...

As you would expect I know quite a few people who had no jabs like myself, and none have suffered from anything but normal health issues...

That is anecdotal of course and you can choose to believe it or not...

But it is now accepted that the way of recording deaths was repeatedly changed...

My partner was re-writing virus risk rules almost weekly, and yet out of the many staff members that the rules were forced upon (from government edicts) and who tested positive none were even hospitalised because of the virus...

A couple of workers died of cancer, but were recorded as dying of covid despite cancer being the cause...

So my advice is not to always blindly believe what you are told!
 
I said to everyone to ignore their "rules".
It turned out that these rules were so essential for our safety that the rulers didn't follow them.
And there are people who still believe in God Covid the Almighty.
 
Then it would seem that there has been an error in ensuring privileged disclosure. Possibly another breach of the code

At least his lawyers are ready to fight this time. I suspect NFA.
Can you expand on that?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top