Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle. icon_question.gif
Bankers and are we royally paying them back big time.
Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle. icon_question.gif
Not when they arrive they haven't. They come to this country for a better life which they get despite the fact that they haven't contributed a penny and have instant access to free medical and dental care, housing, job seeker's allowance etc., you name it, they get itThe books would balance IF
*people didn't assume a right to get paid for nothing
*people didn't act as if it is the government's job to pay for their breeding
*people stuck to the law and declared ALL their earnings.
*People didn't assume a right to a lifestyle that they have not contributed towards.
Isn't that exactly what the immigrants (legal and otherwise) are doing?
Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle.
so in the same vein you would stop me working in England i suppose ?
The books would balance IF
*people didn't assume a right to get paid for nothing
*people didn't act as if it is the government's job to pay for their breeding
*people stuck to the law and declared ALL their earnings.
*People didn't assume a right to a lifestyle that they have not contributed towards.
Isn't that exactly what the immigrants (legal and otherwise) are doing?
Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle.
Not when they arrive they haven't. They come to this country for a better life which they get despite the fact that they haven't contributed a penny and have instant access to free medical and dental care, housing, job seeker's allowance etc., you name it, they get itThe books would balance IF
*people didn't assume a right to get paid for nothing
*people didn't act as if it is the government's job to pay for their breeding
*people stuck to the law and declared ALL their earnings.
*People didn't assume a right to a lifestyle that they have not contributed towards.
Isn't that exactly what the immigrants (legal and otherwise) are doing?
Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle.
The books would balance IF
*people didn't assume a right to get paid for nothing
*people didn't act as if it is the government's job to pay for their breeding
*people stuck to the law and declared ALL their earnings.
*People didn't assume a right to a lifestyle that they have not contributed towards.
Isn't that exactly what the immigrants (legal and otherwise) are doing?
Well...no. They pay for their lifestyle.
No, we pay in jobs and benefits.
They should only be illegible to get back what they paid in. You go to your bank and ask for money you haven't paid in and see what they say.
They should only be illegible to get back what they paid in. You go to your bank and ask for money you haven't paid in and see what they say.
Have you never known anyone in the UK to claim more in benefits and services than they have paid in tax??
I bet there is a big proportion of people here that do just that...but you're fine with that I take it. As long as Darius Sozblitzski doesn't quote £100 a day on a site.
They should only be illegible to get back what they paid in. You go to your bank and ask for money you haven't paid in and see what they say.
Have you never known anyone in the UK to claim more in benefits and services than they have paid in tax??
I bet there is a big proportion of people here that do just that...but you're fine with that I take it. As long as Darius Sozblitzski doesn't quote £100 a day on a site.
But our fathers and forefathers have paid in too. What have the immigrants ancestors paid? There should be a qualifying period of 10 years before they become 'equal'.
Darius Sozblitzski? I can't comment on individual cases.
so in the same vein you would stop me working in England i suppose ?
No Kev, Only in America
I still think your logic is flawed Skitzee. You wouldn't make a very good Vulcan on Startrek.
The govt have admitted that many Eastern Europeans claim family working tax credits, paid into bank accounts in their home country. The checks made are at best lax, at worst, non existant. The treasury admitted last week that they'd probably paid out £600 million in tax credits to EU workers who were not and never were entitled to them.
As I said earlier, it's unscrupulous employers taking advantage of an immigrant workforce who will accept lower wages. Do you think these companies put the cost of their products or services down? Simple answer is no. They make more profit for themselves.
Others have said their bit and yet you have your own rather narrow view, that it's ok to have mass immigration, whatever the cost to British people.
Only today in the papers, comes the news that Britain will have to contribute millions to prop up the Greek Govt's debt. This of course will be paid by less and less taxpayers. So what happens to our National Debt? It's going to spiral out of control while the EU dictate to this once proud country, what we have to spend our money on.
What's the attitude of other European countries to immigration? I think you'll find it's a lot different than ours. Immigrants are discouraged from lots of our EU neighbours. So why can't we do like they do?