Not sure why you decided to repeat all that.
1. Of course, I have not asked every company in the world, and I have no proof.
So your assertion has no basis in fact.
But there are none that I know of, and I have yet to hear anyone tell me otherwise. Yes, err.... my post, my opinions. Your post, your opinions, etc.
Please show me where I have posted an opinion and made it appear to be fact, or posted a fact that is wrong.
2. Yes, I do not know the legalities, like I said, but as far as I am aware, the window fitter is the customer of the manufacturer, irrespective of where the cheque comes from.
No, I told you that you would be the contractual customer, therefore you're already aware of that fact.
3. Hmmm....think you're missing something in previous posts here. If there is an error on the part of the fitter, with measuring for example, and the windows come in wrong, or not as wanted (an opener in the incorrect postion for instance), then I am stuck with them, having paid for them you see.
It takes very little imagination to mitigate that risk - simply obtain a written warranty from the fitter that the measurements are accurate, and that he will be liable for the cost of rectifying an errors in measurements. Then you pass the measurements to the window company yourself.
4. He implies that he is, yet has not proven to someone else (who has asked) that he is. As I have chosen to buy from elsewhere, I have had no need to find out myself for certain, hence the question mark.
In other words, just some gossip about hearsay about some gossip - not factual at all.
5. No, I have the cash ready, as I always do before I ask someone to do a job. I merely do not wish to pay such a large deposit as I find it unusual. I do also find it odd that he never mentioned this earlier in the proceedings, as opposed to a couple of days later.
Well I find it odd that you're so whiny about it, but that's life.
6. No, he specifically said it's a deposit.
I wish you'd make your mind up - at first you said that his wife said that, not him.
Two other quotes I've since had are more or less the same cost
Which is it? Are they more, or less?
so I have no need to assume there's any trade prices, and no need to bite any arms off. In fact I'm better off, as the guy in question no longer offers any guarantees, has zero peperwork, nothing in writing and will accept cash only. Something else I find odd. Now, I'll have a ten year written guarantee, like most other window companies (that I know of) offer.
He has no choice but to give a guarantee, whether written or verbal, explicit or not. This is your statutory right, and if you're at all unsure then you can simply quote the relevant legislation in your written acknowledgment of the quotation. You do give written acknowledgments, don't you?
7. I am not a fool no. I'm not paying any extra, and not paying extra for someone to give a quote, I don't pay for quotes.
You think that you don't pay for quotes, and you think you're not a fool?!
Who do you think is paying for the four quotations that you've received?
I have no idea how the job will turn out no matter who does it...
That's clearly untrue, because you previously claimed that you were happy with the previous work of the first fitter.
8. 'One or two things' is just a saying, something that people say. I can count thanks. I didn't think it was worth saying what I've found out as I thought the post might move off topic and I don't want to slag the guy off. Though, as you ask, Point 4 above is one of the things. I merely started this thread to ask people's opinions on why he asks for such a large up front payment and if it is normal to do so.
So is it one thing, or two things, or more things?
9. Correct, haven't had the work done yet. The stuff is ordered and fitting will be in two or three weeks.
Thank you, but I already know that it's correct - it's extremely rare for me to write something that's incorrect.
Just let me know if you want anything else clarifying/putting straight. But please refrain from name calling and rudeness. Thanks
Please show me where I've called anyone a "name".
Do you not consider it "rude" to post unsubstantiated claims about someone who doesn't have the means of replying to your accusations? Or is that considered good manners where you come from?