
Humiliation for Jeremy Corbyn’s brother as he’s beaten by Count Binface
Count Binface, the self-proclaimed intergalactic space warrior and independent political candidate, outperformed the former Labour leader's rebel brother.
What about them? What part in the by-election (thread title, remember) did the duty on those and the sugar tax play? Are you deliberately trying to take the thread off topic? Stop being a **** all your life - take a day off.What about duty on alcohol and cigarettes - is that money raising or health issue - what about sugar tax?
Just seen Starmer when asked if the ULEZ expansion should be scrapped saying he would 'reflect' on it. When asked again what he meant by 'reflecting' on it, he said both he and Khan would 'reflect' on it. No doubt they will….and do fûck all about it!Her with the ginger growler is speaking out.
Londoners cannot afford Ulez, Labour’s deputy leader has admitted, as she blamed the policy on her party’s loss in the Uxbridge and South Ruislip by-election.
Angela Rayner said Labour had not listened to voters and called for a rethink over Ulez, which she argued was “at the cost of working families who have basically had enough”.
Just seen Starmer when asked if the ULEZ expansion should be scrapped saying he would 'reflect' on it. When asked again what he meant by 'reflecting' on it, he said both he and Khan would 'reflect' on it. No doubt they will….and do fûck all about it!
Take politics out of it for the moment -
Look at the policy - whats your honest view.
The bit outlined is the main reason the scheme is going through court, the processes were apparently NOT deemed to have been followed, that is what the court case will decide.Ulez.
Designed by Boris Johnson and the Tories
Expansion mandated by Grant Shapps and the Tories.
But blamed on Labour, because of tabloids and idiots sharing fake news.
View attachment 308916
Former care workers don't count then?More never had a proper job working class labour MPs enter parliament
To represent the blue collar working bloke and woman![]()
Take politics out of it for the moment -
Look at the policy - whats your honest view.
There's nothing to disagree with in the article or policy, but it does focus on central London rather than an extended area.
There's nothing to disagree with in the article or policy, but it does focus on central London rather than an extended area.
I can see merit in that argument.
That’s the central London congestion charge - nothing to do with ULEZ or ULEZ expansion.
**** me.