Indeed, but what it doesn't add (and quite probably deliberately didn't add) is "...even if that results in non-compliance with explicit requirements of BS7671".
There certainly is nothing to suggest that one can regard something as BS7671-compliant when it is overtly non-compliant with explicit requirements of BS7671, simply because of what a (maybe stupid!) manufacturer has written. Could this not be a problem for those belonging to registration schemes which insist upon BS761-compliance, if they obeyed MIs and thereby became non-compliant with BS7671 (if that situation ever arose)?
Kind Regards, John.
