No, people would just buy their socks somewhere else.
With a necessity like socks you would, but Amazon has created a market for all kind of impulse buy crap that would not necessarily be bought elsewhere if the Amazon shop front did not exist.
No, people would just buy their socks somewhere else.
What you don't seem to understand is that people on a higher income have a far higher 'disposable income' regardless of the tax rate whilst those at the bottom struggle (and often fail) to pay for the basics...Someone on 80K PAYE pays just over 25K in tax effectively 31%, that rises to 39% for 140k, 43% for 250k. By the time the income is 1.5M per year they are capping out at 46%. Someone stupid enough to be on 5M Paye is paying over £2.3M in tax (47%).
Its very easy to say that millionaires don't pay enough tax when it looks like they are rolling in money. But who here would honestly not take steps to reduce a 2.3M tax bill if they were on 5M a year?
Someone on 180k (5 x the national avg) pays 9.6 x more tax.
Its very easy to say that millionaires don't pay enough tax
Someone on 80K PAYE pays just over 25K in tax effectively 31%, that rises to 39% for 140k, 43% for 250k. By the time the income is 1.5M per year they are capping out at 46%. Someone stupid enough to be on 5M Paye is paying over £2.3M in tax (47%).
Its very easy to say that millionaires don't pay enough tax when it looks like they are rolling in money. But who here would honestly not take steps to reduce a 2.3M tax bill if they were on 5M a year?
Someone on 180k (5 x the national avg) pays 9.6 x more tax.
Yet you seem to think nothing will be traded if we leave EU!If Amazon stopped selling socks, do you think the world sock trade would collapse?
No, people would just buy their socks somewhere else.
.... nothing will be traded if we leave EU!
if its legal its not tax dodging
The reality is very few people earning 1M+ are PAYE anyway.
Actually, it is.
But the solution is to change the laws to prevent tax dodging.
Why did no-one think of that before?
Actually, it is.
But the solution is to change the laws to prevent tax dodging.
Why did no-one think of that before?
Whatever amount HMRC legally demand.A UK PLC has a duty to it's shareholders (who ultimately own the company). How much tax should the managing director allow the company to pay?
Legally, yes. However, as I have said, the tax laws are intentionally framed so that the wealthy may pay next to nothing.Do they have an obligation to minimise the tax liability within legal boundaries?
Ok. So - do you think that the pension fund will benefit from Amazon's Bezos having 160 billion for himself (and ex-wife)?Be careful & take the time to think about your answer, because your pension fund invests in this PLC.
If earning 100,000 per week then not bad for him.I don't remember all the exact figures but the top line was £22k+ PER WEEK & some of the stoppages made interesting reading.
Legally, yes. However, as I have said, the tax laws are intentionally framed so that the wealthy may pay next to nothing.