Caught Red Handed

[kendor]

I may not be perfect but then i dont repeatedly get my jollies abusing other people on forums as you seem too, i can if you wish give you the links to some very good .... sites which is what i prefer--sorry no kiddy fiddler ones.

Oh freddie they are rolling off your lips like water!

 

[Freddie]

Shut up you old fart

 

[Softus]

...all i can see from your posts is nasty coments towards people who don't agree with what you say.

This is an example of someone finding exactly what they wanted to find.

 

[paulbrown]

This is an example of someone finding exactly what they wanted to find.

No, it is an example of you taking one part of a post for your own ends.

It was the conclusion i reached after reading the criminal justice and caught red handed threads. While I don't think he was the only guilty party, his were doubtless very nasty and personal comments, i was not the only one to say so either.

He also hasn't answered my question about where he said this either.

ban-all-sheds wrote:
I simply said that her story, be it a wind-up, a troll or just a joke had such a hollow ring to it that I was no longer prepared to join in the wind-up, take the bait or share in the joke.

As you seem to represent him, perhaps you can direct me to where the above was originally said?
All i am trying to do is find out who is telling the truth not start a row. i can't find the above, except in this thread, so am only asking where, when or indeed, if, it was ever actually said.

 

[Moz]

CALM DOWN ...
CALM DOWN ..
WHERES THE LOVE >>>
Oh I forget since my mate Julie L/B ,the voice of reason aint here anymore its anarchy here........ *mozs heart dies every sec since shes been gone *

 

[Softus]

I simply said that her story, be it a wind-up, a troll or just a joke had such a hollow ring to it that I was no longer prepared to join in the wind-up, take the bait or share in the joke.

Have just returned from working away. I have read the recent post on here with interest nothing changes i see. Where did you say the above banallsheds? because I can't find it in any of your posts. all i can see from your posts is nasty coments towards people who don't agree with what you say.is that why your posts have been removed by mods

To answer your question, just in case nobody else has, the relevant posting was made on Tuesday Jan 03 2006 at 11:43 pm, on the topic "Criminal Justice System".

...all i can see from your posts is nasty coments towards people who don't agree with what you say.

This is an example of someone finding exactly what they wanted to find.

No, it is an example of you taking one part of a post for your own ends.
It was the conclusion i reached after reading the criminal justice and caught red handed threads. While I don't think he was the only guilty party, his were doubtless very nasty and personal comments, i was not the only one to say so either.

Well, the entire post is now quoted above, so we can see that even though I extracted one sentence the entire meaning was preserved.

What you wrote was "all you could see from your posts" - this is nonsense. If you couldn't a single positive poin from amongst the 8000+ postings then there's something wrong with your eyes.

He also hasn't answered my question about where he said this either.

ban-all-sheds wrote:
I simply said that her story, be it a wind-up, a troll or just a joke had such a hollow ring to it that I was no longer prepared to join in the wind-up, take the bait or share in the joke.

As you seem to represent him, perhaps you can direct me to where the above was originally said?

Please see the above.

BTW, this idea that I represent someone else? Pure fantasy on your part. But then you already know that, so this was another example of you writing one thing and apparently meaning something entirely different. This is a great way to p*ss people off, so don't be too surprised when you get some more robust responses.

All i am trying to do is find out who is telling the truth not start a row. i can't find the above, except in this thread, so am only asking where, when or indeed, if, it was ever actually said.

Well boo f***ing hoo - where in the rules does it say that your questions HAVE to be answered? And why are you so intent on finding the post anyway?

These are all rhetorical questions by the way - I have no interest in your answers, I merely wanted you to know how ludicrous your postings are.

 

[hermes]

All i am trying to do is find out who is telling the truth not start a row. .

Please start a row, they are much more entertaining.

 

[hermes]

Softus is it true that you're representing BAS? How much do you charge? Would you represent me as well because I usually like your posts better than my own!

 

[paulbrown]

softus said,

To answer your question, just in case nobody else has, the relevant posting was made on Tuesday Jan 03 2006 at 11:43 pm, on the topic "Criminal Justice System".

No it wasn't and the part that was moderated, was for rudeness, it was not the comment in question.

Well, the entire post is now quoted above, so we can see that even though I extracted one sentence the entire meaning was preserved.

No it wasn't.

What you wrote was "all you could see from your posts" - this is nonsense. If you couldn't a single positive poin from amongst the 8000+ postings then there's something wrong with your eyes.

Must be my eyes because I am struggling making out what you've said here. I haven't read the other 8000+posts and only asked about one particular comment.

Well boo f***ing hoo - where in the rules does it say that your questions HAVE to be answered? And why are you so intent on finding the post anyway?

I don't recall saying you do have to answer, you decided to do that yourself. I actually asked the writer where it was. You took it on yourself to answer on his behalf. Hence my comment that you seemed to be representing him, I never said you were, did I?

BTW, this idea that I represent someone else? Pure fantasy on your part. But then you already know that, so this was another example of you writing one thing and apparently meaning something entirely different. This is a great way to p*ss people off, so don't be too surprised when you get some more robust responses.

Robust. you appear to be getting upset, yet my questions were to b-a-s and not you.

I have said I don't want a row, I am a newbie here and have only read a few threads and didn't remember the comment, thats all. Why are you getting upset about a simple question. Do you have I problem with my asking it?

 

[paulbrown]

All i am trying to do is find out who is telling the truth not start a row. .

Please start a row, they are much more entertaining.

hermes, I am not interested in a row, I have simply asked a question. I didn't realise this could be seen as being argumentative.

 

[Softus]

paulbrown, I think there's enough ambiguity in your words that it's pointless going further with this. For example, you did indeed say that I "seem to be representing" b-a-s, but you're rather naive if you think that I woulnd't intrepret as either (a) sarcasm, or (b) a sign of your belief that I am representing him. Hence, your subsequent claim that I'd given your words a different interpretation is somewhat hollow. Unless you were being sarcastic, in which case please go forth and prosper.

Whether or not I'm upset isn't relevant, and it certainly is none of your business, so be careful not to goad, or your wide-eyed newbie innocence will start to sound rather disingenuous.

What is absolutely certain is that I have no interest in carrying on a vicarious argument, or debate, about someone else's comments.

If you're truly not into creating an argument, then you will also back off. This doesn't preclude you replying of course, I won't take that as "last-word-syndrome".

 

[paulbrown]

softus said.

Whether or not I'm upset isn't relevant, and it certainly is none of your business, so be careful not to goad, or your wide-eyed newbie innocence will start to sound rather disingenuous.

I didn't say I was a newbie, I said I am a newbie here.

I have said I don't want a row, I am a newbie here and have only read a few threads and didn't remember the comment, thats all. Why are you getting upset about a simple question. Do you have I problem with my asking it?

Your bravo machinations worry me not sir, resistance is futile.

 

[Softus]

Bravo? Resistance? What on Earth are you talking about

Or, to be pedantic, what are you talking about here?

 

[paulbrown]

 

[Softus]

Do you actually have anything to contribute to the subject matter of the topic, which was actually quite a serious one that meant something to the participants?