Church Scandal gone global.

[dextrous]

still darwins theory is only a theory, a bizzaree one too, and why is it when athiests are challenged they come up with childish resoning.

unlike those with "faith" then

about the choking thing, dont you think its a good thing we choke, othe wise we would be animals, without reason or compassion...other than athiest that is

what the f**k?

and again darwins theory is a thoery a wild one at that which has never been proven, and he is an athiest which explains the childish thoery....need i say more oh yes which was never proven

There is a lot of physical evidence which supports this theory, which Darwin was the first to write down but which had been observed for quite a while previously (including John Hunter's extensive collection of all things dead (18th century) ). There is less evidence that demonstrates theoretically or empirically that a "god" had anything to do with it all.

im putting my top hat on

Why are you copying my signature? Imitation is the highest form of flattery I suppose

 

[skitzee2k]

The human brain is programmed to see patterns...and we do, whether they are there or not...in clouds we see rabbit and sheep for example, an old nail in the wall can look like a spider in the night....it is just our brains OVER processing.

you have just stated in your own sentence, we are programmed whihc means we have been created, just like apc has been created, and could never come about by chance...

self defeat.

im taking my top hat off, my brains evolving and getting big lol

...you are clutching at straws my friend
There is no flaw.

 

[alsheating]

there may be a lot of intelligent design cases which could be used by darwin, stil it does not make his THEORY, a law, which takes darwins out of the picture for explaining life.

 

[alsheating]

hey on another topic how do you get the text in white boxes ??

whats the evolotuin thoery behind this?

 

[alsheating]

alsheating be pmsl, about skitzee

 

[skitzee2k]

there may be a lot of intelligent design cases which could be used by darwin, stil it does not make his THEORY, a law, which takes darwins out of the picture for explaining life.

Funnily enough, The Theory of Evolution is starting to be referred to as a 'Law' in the same way that gravity is

If you honestly have a question about evolution that you would like an answer to, i'll even show you evidence and proof and talk to you about why, aswell.

 

[alsheating]

actually there is so much evidence that god exists, and if you put two expert athiest and two experts on God, the athiests seem to loose thier tongues, as I have seen on debate shows, again I am not a master of theology or religion just a fellow human who belives in god so no point singling me out as the expert with all the proofs, but it does exist and against religious scholars ahiests fall flat on thie faces as I have seen and almost wet myself with luaghter.

 

[alsheating]

No thanks, I do not want proof of athiesm as said before proove to me that god does not exist, and why we should be athiestss.

on another hand I assume its ok to be an thiest and not provide solid proof yet a person if faith has to provide proof,

again I do not have a msters in theology and religion

 

[cornishwizard]

If priests believed in god would they be fiddling with little boys and risk going to hell

 

[alsheating]

no prises for guessing who is starting to call it a law, hey skitz

Funnily enough, The Theory of Evolution is starting to be referred to as a 'Law' in the same way that gravity is

 

[alsheating]

If priests believed in god would they be fiddling with little boys and risk going to hell

whats to say priests or some priests in the vatican arnt athiests in disguise

couldnt resist, but a fair point at that

 

[cornishwizard]

I have often thought that the best job for me would have been a vicar

 

[Blasphemous]

without god, why and how would we exist, and know right from wrong well most of us.

to believe there is no god or supreme power behind creation, is like to say the iffle tower came about by pure chance and coincidence by itself...and what are the odds of that....really?

intelligent design must have a creator, even science cannot deny this.

I think you need to read that long post that cornishman put on here a page ago.

I think you mean, that he 'cut and pasted' on here.

 

[skitzee2k]

No thanks, I do not want proof of athiesm as said before proove to me that god does not exist, and why we should be athiestss.

on another hand I assume its ok to be an thiest and not provide solid proof yet a person if faith has to provide proof,

again I do not have a msters in theology and religion

..believing in evolution does not make you an atheist.
As I have said, you cannot prove a negative. You cannot prove that Santa isn't real. You cannot prove it.

The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim that something exists.

As I have said, I will be happy to talk to you about any inconsistencies or errors you feel Natural selection has...

 

[cornishwizard]

without god, why and how would we exist, and know right from wrong well most of us.

to believe there is no god or supreme power behind creation, is like to say the iffle tower came about by pure chance and coincidence by itself...and what are the odds of that....really?

intelligent design must have a creator, even science cannot deny this.

I think you need to read that long post that cornishman put on here a page ago.

I think you mean, that he 'cut and pasted' on here.

what is wrong with cutting and pasting