Eddie M said:notb665 said:David E said:Or even glacial acetic acid or CH3COOH. Cant work out how to make a proper subscript 3
OK clever dick:
You're missing 2 carbons and 3 hydrogens, also it's in 2D and doesn't show the steric properties of the molecule
5/10 see me after school
I am not missing 2 carbons and 3 hydrogens. They are considered too obvious to warrant detail: the diagram should NOT be drawn like this:
Note I have drawn the steric properties on the diagram above. But like I say, too detailed and cumbersome: it would all get in the way if I was to start drawing electron attacks and stuff. And the steric properties only represent the most probable formation - there is rotation around all the bonds.
What next? You want me to draw the free electron pairs on the double bonded oxygen? Come on!
And I suspect you know all this!