Because there will be no indication that it is there.Btw, I'd really like to know, how wiriing, embedded behind tiling and mostly behind a splashback (which will never be drilled into, does not constitute as a safe zone?
That's why, IMO, it should be controlled by the cooker switch.The even more puzzling thing is how can the FCU, to be mounted almost 2.5 metres above floor level, is easily accessible for easy isoloation in the potential event of the chimney becoming live or it sucking up a pan fire be acceptable? It just doesn't seem like that is a common sense approach.
As above.Surely it'd be much better placed alongside a socket above the worktops
Not just daft - pointless.I do agree that it's daft that the cooker switch is behind the cooker , and if I'd have had enough give on the cable I'd have extended it up and to the side what it probably should've been
From the point-of-view of cable routing, that would be fine. In fact, the FCU and horizontal cable from it do not need to be within 150cm of the ceiling, since the FCU creates a horizontal 'safe zone' for the cable regarless of how far it is from the ceiling.Please see the diagram below, showing the new proposals to ensure compliance as per the spirited discussions that have led before ... Hope this satisfies all
The regulations presumably do not accept that it's inevitable that it will "never been drilled into". There are certainly plenty of holes drilled in tiles, and I've even seen some drilled in splashbacks.Btw, I'd really like to know, how wiriing, embedded behind tiling and mostly behind a splashback (which will never be drilled into, does not constitute as a safe zone?
The thing to understand is that 'safe zones' only relate to the welfare of buried cables. To have the only means of isolation of the hood high on the wall is clearly not very satisfactory, but that's nothing to do with safe zones. As EFLI keeps saying, the proper way is to have the hood supplied (via an FCU) by an (accessible) cooker isolator/switch.The even more puzzling thing is how can the FCU, to be mounted almost 2.5 metres above floor level, is easily accessible for easy isoloation in the potential event of the chimney becoming live or it sucking up a pan fire be acceptable? It just doesn't seem like that is a common sense approach. - Not meaning to say the advice being given is wrong or that I don't agree, I understand some of these things are out of our control, I just think it's very odd way of defining safe zones
Indeed, and that's the ideal place for it (although not so important if fed from an accessible cooker isolator). You really should have thought about cable routing before you fixed the wall units!Surely it'd be much better placed alongside a socket above the worktops ?
As EFLI has said, it serves absolutely no purpose where it is, and denies you a nearby accessible means of isolating the cooker. It really isn't very satisfactory!I do agree that it's daft that the cooker switch is behind the cooker , and if I'd have had enough give on the cable I'd have extended it up and to the side where it probably should've been in the first place
//www.diynot.com/wiki/electrics:wallsBtw, I'd really like to know, how wiriing, embedded behind tiling and mostly behind a splashback (which will never be drilled into, does not constitute as a safe zone?
It's not. Don't put it there.The even more puzzling thing is how can the FCU, to be mounted almost 2.5 metres above floor level, is easily accessible for easy isoloation
It would be. So put it there.Surely it'd be much better placed alongside a socket above the worktops ?
Either do it properly or don't have the switch.
Quote:
It would be. So put it there.
It is most unusual to run the cooker circuit directly to a point under the worktop; are you sure it is as you think?
From which direction did the cable come to the switch?
You really should have thought about cable routing before you fixed the wall units!
I don't think there's really any conflict. Both are really saying that there is absolutely no point in having an emergency/isolation switch hidden behind the cooker, so there's no point in having such a switch there. Unless you were prepared to do without a switch at all, that would mean moving it to a conventional location above the worktops, with a cable going from it down to an outlet plate behind the cooker.Despite the length of time taken & the extra work entailed I would prefer to do it 'properly' but now I'm getting conflicting info ... EFLI saysBut BAS is sayingEither do it properly or don't have the switch.Quote: It would be. So put it there.
Both Simon35 (per my diagram) and BAS have indicated ways in which it can be done. However, given the wall behind the cooker is not a safe zone (other than in the eyes of flameport), the ONLY (as far as I can see) way of getting a compliant feed up to the hood from a conventionally-placed cooker switch would involve the cable going behind wall units - which you say you don't want to take off. ... which, unless you change your view about the wall units, seems to leave no options other the 'feeding from above' approach (which leaves the only means of isolation of the hood in a daft place).Could someone, PLEASE amend the diagram showing how it would be safe zone & compliant by having the FCU above the worktops & how the wiring would be done to ensure the cabling is within the safe zones & without going behind the wall units
OK, but that doesn't, IMO, make it any less crazy that a cooker switch was put behind where the cooker is going. To have to have a joint in the cable so that the switch could be moved up to a sensible place would, IMO, be far less of an 'evil' than keeping the switch where it is!The new wiring for cooker switch was only done recently, well after the cupboards were put in hence the reason they are behind the floor unitsYou really should have thought about cable routing before you fixed the wall units!
I don't think there's really any conflict. Both are really saying that there is absolutely no point in having an emergency/isolation switch hidden behind the cooker, so there's no point in having such a switch there. Unless you were prepared to do without a switch at all, that would mean moving it to a conventional location above the worktops, with a cable going from it down to an outlet plate behind the cooker.Despite the length of time taken & the extra work entailed I would prefer to do it 'properly' but now I'm getting conflicting info ... EFLI saysBut BAS is sayingEither do it properly or don't have the switch.Quote: It would be. So put it there.
Both Simon35 (per my diagram) and BAS have indicated ways in which it can be done. However, given the wall behind the cooker is not a safe zone (other than in the eyes of flameport), the ONLY (as far as I can see) way of getting a compliant feed up to the hood from a conventionally-placed cooker switch would involve the cable going behind wall units - which you say you don't want to take off. ... which, unless you change your view about the wall units, seems to leave no options other the 'feeding from above' approach (which leaves the only means of isolation of the hood in a daft place).Could someone, PLEASE amend the diagram showing how it would be safe zone & compliant by having the FCU above the worktops & how the wiring would be done to ensure the cabling is within the safe zones & without going behind the wall units
OK, but that doesn't, IMO, make it any less crazy that a cooker switch was put behind where the cooker is going. To have to have a joint in the cable so that the switch could be moved up to a sensible place would, IMO, be far less of an 'evil' than keeping the switch where it is!The new wiring for cooker switch was only done recently, well after the cupboards were put in hence the reason they are behind the floor unitsYou really should have thought about cable routing before you fixed the wall units!
Kind Regards, John
No less accessible than the screwed connections in a cooker outlet plate (which, after all, is just a JB by another name)!!Is a JB behind a built-in oven considered accesible for maintenance?.....
That is, indeed, the obvious solution - and a hassle that would have been avoided if thought had been given to the electrics at an appropriate point in timeOP, just take the wall units down, chop out for the cable and patch it up. They will go back up just as well as they came down....unless they have a pelmet or cornice round....
Indeed.Or better still, ask the electrician who's signing this off to advise.
Is a JB behind a built-in oven considered accesible for maintenance?.....
Fair enough, but that doesn't alter what I said - connection units (effectively JBs) with screwed connections are common behind both built-in and free-standing cookers/ovens, and are not a reason for concern to me. 'Built in' ones usually more-or-less 'pull out', just as do freestanding ones.I didn't mean to convey the cooker is built in, the cooker is a standard 600mm width
In common sense terms, that would certainly be a step in the right direction. Do I take it that you can get at the wall behind the floor unit to do that? You'll obviously have to bring another cable back down from the re-located cooker switch to a connection unit to connect to the cooker.I would be happy to move the cooker switch, put a joint in it to ensure it's in the correct place and easily accessible ...
That's a pity. I have to say that if I regarded the fixation of the wall units as being as iffy as you suggest, I'd probably be worried about them even without taking them off!... but I really do not wish to take the wall unit off, I am sure they will not go up as sturdy and I can't afford to take that chance
Again a pity - when one realises that it's 'stupid' because of safety considerations. I accept that the chances of your ever wanting/needing to isolate the hood is probably very small, but ..... !If it was a new-ish kitchen or a full refurb I'd do it immediately but it's a partial refurb so will just stick to having the cable feedling from the bedroom above and have the FCU in a stupid position
Do I take it that you can get at the wall behind the floor unit to do that?
You'll obviously have to bring another cable back down from the re-located cooker switch to a connection unit to connect to the cooker.
That's a pity. I have to say that if I regarded the fixation of the wall units as being as iffy as you suggest, I'd probably be worried about them even without taking them off!
... a hassle that would have been avoided if thought had been given to the electrics at an appropriate point in time
You can put a plug on it. How will that look and how did you think it would look?I had (incorrectly it seems) assumed that the hood would be fitted with a plug which I'd just put into the nearby worktop sockets
You can do that.or spur off of to create an additional one,
but I am now having to add an FCU, wire that in and the rest aswell has alraedy set me back, to then remove units I won't be able to do until a weekend (if I can get some help) unfortunately is just a bridge too far for me
It saddens me to say it as I say I don't like taking the shorter 'easier' options but my situation and predicament has had to dictate me to that very outcome
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local