CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE

[IT Minion]

FFS it says the article needs further citations for verification.

To any normal person that suggests it's unverified.

No, it means the Wikipedia pedants are out in force. They normally do valuable work but obscure WW2 legislation is not a high priority.

 

[denso13]

"Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources."

Anyone can add that, even Wikipedia bots looking for agreed format and citation rules.

What would be more sensible is to point to the bit you think is wrong.

 

[Stadan20]

I don't live on wiki so I wouldn't know . Says since 2010 ... long time though

 

[fillyboy]

From your link.

One of the key policies of Wikipedia is that all article content has to be verifiable. This means that reliable sources must be able to support the material. All quotations, any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, and contentious material (whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons must include an inline citation to a source that directly supports the material. This also means that Wikipedia is not the place for original work, archival findings that have not been published, or evidence from any source that has not been published.

If you are adding new content, it is your responsibility to add sourcing information along with it. Material provided without a source is significantly more likely to be removed from an article. Sometimes it will be tagged first with a "citation needed" template to give editors a chance to find and add sources, but often editors will simply remove it because they question its veracity.

Unverified, you've just confirmed it yourself.

 

[IT Minion]

https://microform.digital/boa/collections/9/volumes/58/defence-regulation-18b-detainee-sir-oswald-mosley-1943-1945?filters[query]=&filters[modelType]=document&orderBy=

Confirmation there.

 

[denso13]

Unverified, you've just confirmed it yourself.

Nope, it doesn't say unverified at all. There is a big difference.

As I said, It would just be easier to point out where it is wrong.

 

[denso13]

the fact the west is suppressing news agencies such as RTL

Good. Russian scum.

 

[denso13]

 

[IT Minion]

It doesn't help that Russia has failed to win. What was expected to be a crushing defeat has shown just how hollow the Russian military is and how inferior their equipment is.

With that sort of reality it's hard to win a propaganda war.

 

[gas112]

It doesn't help that Russia has failed to win. What was expected to be a crushing defeat has shown just how hollow the Russian military is and how inferior their equipment is.

With that sort of reality it's hard to win a propaganda war.

how inferior there equipment is ?
Explain how Ukraine hasnt driven them back despite being given billions of dollars worth of top class western arms constantly being replenished as they are destroyed as well as having top class training from the likes of UK an America.

 

[gas112]

UK tanks to cause 'real problems' for Russia on Ukrainian frontline

Professor Michael Clarke, a prominent military analyst, told Express.co.uk that Ukraine could use Britain's Challenger 2 tanks to split the combat frontline and "isolate Crimea".

www.express.co.uk

.
Amazed the war isnt over yet

 

[denso13]

 

[carmanmemoranda]

There's more poo tin apologists around than I thought.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

With zelensky`s coke habit he wont have a nose left

Any facts to support this stupid allegation?

 

[denso13]

With zelensky`s coke habit he wont have a nose left

Fake news.