I've always thought that worked better as a blockbuster grid.Bingo!!
Covid - how long to test positive for?
- Thread starter Harry Bloomfield
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Science?
Not really, for two reasons here:
1. that's not what vaccines are generally developed for, IIRC.
They're developed to prime the immune system, to enable it to prevent or lessen the effects on the individual, in the event of becoming infected for real.
2. I was vaccinated well after those reports anyway.
In cases like Partygate, yes (until further evidence is weighed in, that is).
That's why you should dig deeper, instead of making your mind up, then seeking your confirmatory balm.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
What narrative do you believe? Or it is just the opposite to the vast majority of scientific research and advice, for the sake of it?
Sponsored Links
I'd say what surprises me but then nothing surprises me going off what some of the commentators come out with on here, is the callous disregard for all those who've lost their lives because covid was the only kid in town.
Every night we were treated to Boris and his stooges telling us about how serious the virus was and so the general public were triggered being as it was at the forefront of their mind. All the while what wasn't being talked about was all the bodies out the back piling up because they couldn't get treatment.
Every night we were treated to Boris and his stooges telling us about how serious the virus was and so the general public were triggered being as it was at the forefront of their mind. All the while what wasn't being talked about was all the bodies out the back piling up because they couldn't get treatment.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
Your language betrays your real thinking on this. You can of course believe anything you like but don't pretend it is based on fact. Unless you have any of course?
Wher do I say I've made my mind up that's supposition at its best.
History tells us that everything might not have been as it seemed.
Tony Blair will tell you that, remember the weapons of mass distraction.
That would be blinkered now wouldn't it.
Best to 'shop around' for your news. However, what would be down right preposterous would be to seek out a quack website that is known to spread fake news and lies, then believe that, whilst at the same time dismissing news sources known to be reliable. Totally irrational/gullible/foolish.
D
Deleted member 267285
Nothing scares me about it, just don’t want it.
Worth their weight in gold 'reliable source's of news' who people follow religiously to be infiltrated by people of less worthy ambitions. You've only to look no farther than the BBC whose relevance is becoming secondary now it's chosen the woke route.
Other msm "reliable" sources? They all seem to shut up shop in procuring an alternative voice during covid for fear of being stopped from printing by offsted.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
What do you count as reliable?
Smart ar*se eh was you anything else.
Offcom that suit you sir.
You tell me, they've all got to make a living or else they'd go out of business.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,323
- Reaction score
- 2,398
- Country
Why do you find this so difficult? The MSM, the Government, the medical profession, in fact everyone is lying about Covid according to the tinfoil hatters.
But still you won't/can't explain where you get your "reliable" info.
Sponsored Links
