Double-jabbed people carry same levels of Covid as unvaccinated...

[ajohn]

Show me the paragraph saying so.

The results show that infections occurring 12 d or longer after vaccination have significantly reduced viral loads at the time of testing, potentially affecting viral shedding and contagiousness as well as the severity of the disease13. This report is based on an

Clearly you can't read or lack comprehension skills. 12 days is nearly as long as the period people need to isolate for if they may have it. It takes that long to find out.

The whole problem all along is that people can infect others before they know they have it and of course asymptomatic.

 

[ajohn]

Show me the paragraph saying so.

The results show that infections occurring 12 d or longer after vaccination have significantly reduced viral loads at the time of testing, potentially affecting viral shedding and contagiousness as well as the severity of the disease13. This report is based on an

Clearly you can't read or lack comprehension skills. 12 days is nearly as long as the period people need to isolate for if they may have it. It takes that long to find out.Typically reckoned to be 7 days plus.

The whole problem all along is that people can infect others before they know they have it and of course asymptomatics.

LOL I haven't made any claims at all - just reported one. TBH when I get replies like yours I just think twirp as you should clearly know what I am pointing out end of or can't understand it. I can do little about that.

 

[JohnD]

So you originally claimed

indicating that they are just as good at infecting others.

But you now say the report says

The results show that infections occurring 12 d or longer after vaccination have significantly reduced viral loads at the time of testing, potentially affecting viral shedding and contagiousness as well as the severity of the disease

Which does not support your claim.

Quite the reverse

I'm glad we identified your mistake.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

Who exactly is the one who is afraid.

You.

Unquestionably.

Snivelling, trembling, pants-wettingly scared.

And as mad as a box of frogs.

 

[denso13]

And read it
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01316-7

This is the title "Initial report of decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine", it says the complete opposite of what you claimed.

 

[IT Minion]

The results show that infections occurring 12 d or longer after vaccination have significantly reduced viral loads at the time of testing, potentially affecting viral shedding and contagiousness as well as the severity of the disease13. This report is based on an

Clearly you can't read or lack comprehension skills. 12 days is nearly as long as the period people need to isolate for if they may have it. It takes that long to find out.

The whole problem all along is that people can infect others before they know they have it and of course asymptomatic.

You seem to be confused. The 12 days refers to the minimum time since vaccination before they are infected. It's setting a boundary for the data, nothing to do with how long after infection people are shedding virus particles or not.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

Is the report too much for your brain?

Is it too much for your brain to remember, all the time, the qualifier "in people who became infected despite being fully vaccinated"?

 

[ajohn]

Which does not support your claim.

It's not my claim. It's a simplified claim via a TV channel and the graphs support it. Did you look at the date on the report? Did you notice why I said it's being reported now?

Also aspects concerning the real world which may or may not differ to the report.

Then look at the graphs and think what significant means in a scientific sense. Also read the riders mentioned.

Or carry on making silly posts just because you know you are wrong.

Actually all that interests me is that changes have been made to how covid is being handled. The reports indicate that this may not be a good idea on one of them. We will be finding out as they have been made. The weekly reports will show any changes that matter but take several weeks to do so. Currently some aspects look like they generally always have. Infected numbers tend to decrease with age. Other things look distinctly different. They have also changed the way they report infection levels. PCR and LFD are clearly split. Reinfection is being monitored more carefully. They also count incidents in various areas. Not numbers of people, just where they have happened. Care homes are significant again but looks to be stable. Education is low for obvious reasons.

 

[JohnD]

It's not my claim.

it's what you said.

you didn't quote anybody who told you, or anywhere you'd read it.

and you were wrong.

 

[ajohn]

Sorry folks I will stick to the tvs interpretation of it and also bear in mind why it is being reported now. Reducing the sensitivity of the NHS app seems to be the main reason and as always when something changes counter arguments will crop up.

you didn't quote anybody who told you, or anywhere you'd read it.

I'm sure I mentioned the TV at some point.

 

[John the plumber]

You.

Unquestionably.

Snivelling, trembling, pants-wettingly scared.

And as mad as a box of frogs.

Oooohhh is someone getting abit upset.
And yet your the one taking a jab to supposedly protect yourself against a so called virus with a death rate of less than 1 %.
Ask nicely and Boris might hold your hand to keep you safe

 

[Captain Nemesis]

You know - in a properly run society it would be illegal for this site not to silence you.

 

[John the plumber]

You know - in a properly run society it would be illegal for this site not to silence you.

What exactly is it I’m supposedly scared of and in a properly run society nobody would need to be,coerced, bribed ,forced,financially persuaded to have a so called vaccine to fight a so called deadly virus.
Regarding the silence are you stating that freedom off speech should be eradicated?

 

[Trazor]

Regarding the silence are you stating that freedom off speech should be eradicated?

No, just that Lunatics should be housed in secure Psychiatric institutions.

 

[Captain Nemesis]

What exactly is it I’m supposedly scared of and in a properly run society nobody would need to be,coerced, bribed ,forced,financially persuaded to have a so called vaccine to fight a so called deadly virus.

That you use terms like that shows you are so far beyond reason that it would be pointless to even try using it with you.

Regarding the silence are you stating that freedom off speech should be eradicated?

Eradicate the freedom to spread lies which kill people?

All day long.