- Joined
- 7 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 8,831
- Reaction score
- 1,230
- Country
You ever started an interesting thread ......post me the link.
Dr Andrew Wakefield and the MMR vaccine
- Thread starter gasbanni
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 8,831
- Reaction score
- 1,230
- Country
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 8,831
- Reaction score
- 1,230
- Country
What when the bma was overruled on the very subject and their argument was found to be in error ? you seriously need to read up on it.
The other Co author was completely exonerated and re instated but wakefields professional indemnity would fund it, the other professor chaps would.
You really need to read up on the subject.
Where in the links discussing the fact that Dr Walker-Smith was re instated does it discuss the link between autism and the MMR jab?
Oh right, it doesn't. Because him being struck off (and Wakefield) was nothing to do with the claims about MMR and Autism.
MR Andrew Wakefield had plenty of money (enough to attempt libel action against The Times and Channel 4) to fight his corner, but he didn't, probably because he knew he would lose.
The reason he was struck off was not the postulated link between autism and the MMR jab, it was the unethical, immoral experiments he conducted on children without oversight from the Ethics board.
Gasbanni- if you are going to post about such things, you really need to do some proper reading. Not conspiracy websites that don't understand the science. None of the papers you posted yesterday support your hypothesis. Most of the papers in the above link are completely unrelated or have serious flaws.
Lets take Japan as an example. They stopped using the MMR jab in the early 90s. Since this is the case, you would expect autism diagnoses to have slowed down, or stopped.
Oh wait, they have continued to grow at a FASTER rate than before they stopped using the jab. Funny that. Its as if there is something else causing autism.
As previously stated, Wakefield had a vested interest in bad mouthing the single jab, as he had founded a company that was set to offer the triple jab and make lots of money.
He isn't some lone voice crusader for the truth. He is a crook. Plain and simple.
Sponsored Links
I have read up on it. I base my views on this thing called evidence.
This issue has been thoroughly studied, and Wakefield's fraud well known.
Many of his associates claim they were deceived by him of course, but the important thing is that the truth has come out: That there is NO LINK to autism. The world knows this, including Italy, and Venezuela:
http://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/italian-mmr-autism-decision-overturned/
https://www.researchgate.net/profil...elan_study/links/5473acd90cf245eb436db7ed.pdf
MMR vaccines are safe. Anyone who tries to spread the lies risk the well being of the vulnerable. We have seen outbreaks of measles, and mumps in the wake of this scandal, and you are screwing a dead horse.
How much evidence do you want before you realise you are wrong? (Don't try to spin that one around, as there isn't evidence in your favour beyond a few conspiracy sites)
Here is a start for those not familiar:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine_controversy
https://web.archive.org/web/20080913173824/http://www.mmrthefacts.nhs.uk/basics/truths.php
http://www.senseaboutscience.org/resources.php/123/are-single-vaccines-safer-than-the-mmr-jab
https://www.autismspeaks.org/scienc...k-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids
http://briandeer.com/mmr-lancet.htm
And lets not forget that despite Wakefield's fraud and lies, the infamous 1998 Lancet article actually said:
"We did not prove an association between MMR vaccine and the syndrome described" and none of the studies since have found a link. In fact no credible study has ever found a link.
Or we can look other lies, not just Wakefield's:
http://briandeer.com/solved/mother-lied-protection-news.htm
The people that spread these lies are exploiting desperate parents of kids with autism. Am I the only one who finds that sickening?
No, I agree whole heartedly with you! Bunch of immoral unethical fraudulent bell ends
So you've given up the idea of trying to defend that lying crook Wakefield.
It's difficult to ascertain what you class as interesting. Looking at the repetitive, troll-worthy dross you sully this site with, leaves me at a loss. I can't find anything of mine that is anywhere near that bad.
Do you know how to use the search facility?
No ones saying all vaccines are perfectly safe.
People have adverse reactions to medical treatments. Some people, sometimes. These people should be compensated, as if the medical treatment has been mandated, or not they are suffering through no fault of their own.
Some people are allergic to penicillin, does that mean we should ban all antibiotics?
The reason that vaccines are important are quite complex, and given your attitude and level of scientific aptitude I wont waste my time explaining them.
No. Not worth my time. Toddle of and watch some more conspiracy videos on YouTube.
Maybe start a thread about chemtrails, that should be amusing.
N
Newboy
Except that your link doesn't refer to Andrew Wakefield
Sponsored Links
