Expanded ULEZ

[motorbiking]

poor potato harvests and tariffs on Russian sourced Fish have of course nothing to do with it.

 

[motorbiking]

doesn't look like this is slowly becoming accepted at all

Large parts of South London now ULEZ free.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1Us9USuI5Vn4TenF8pVEKHCgUPtfN7pM&ll=51.421126426578674%2C-0.10822438431870363&z=11&fbclid=IwAR2E8nwhFwMzv2zCm3iBm0n3YN7DWR-h54NV8LtD_jsCvNM3Aa3qxt5AH6Y

 

[Mottie]

Meanwhile, silence from the Khant as yet another teenager is stabbed to death on his patch. Probably too busy getting his ULEZ expansion and job saving revenue sorted to be trifled with a little thing like a teenage girl being stabbed to death on her way to school.

 

[motorbiking]

I suspect he is working on his re-election campaign.

 

[noseall]

doesn't look like this is slowly becoming accepted at all

Large parts of South London now ULEZ free.

https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1Us9USuI5Vn4TenF8pVEKHCgUPtfN7pM&ll=51.421126426578674%2C-0.10822438431870363&z=11&fbclid=IwAR2E8nwhFwMzv2zCm3iBm0n3YN7DWR-h54NV8LtD_jsCvNM3Aa3qxt5AH6Y

Criminal damage. Domestic terrorism. Vandalism.
Your favourite lawbreaking, when it suits you. Astonishing hypocrisy.

 

[Mottie]

Criminal damage. Domestic terrorism. Vandalism.
Your favourite lawbreaking, when it suits you. Astonishing hypocrisy.

One man’s terrorist and all that.……. I’m sure you're not against the odd bit of lawbreaking when it suits you.

 

[motorbiking]

Domestic terrorism. . @noseall legal knowledge knows no limits.

I would suggest he reads sec 5. If the perpetrator held an honest belief, even if that belief was wrong, that he was defending the rights of the people and had authority to act as he did. He has a defence to criminal damage even if, that belief is based on nothing other than the legal advice of a builder who has no clue about law.

That is not to say he isn’t liable for the costs.

 

[gant]

Not happy.

Company says 20mph limit making buses late and they will change timetables

Arriva Wales confirmed there will be changes to bus routes and frequencies as a result of the much-debated 20mph policy

www.walesonline.co.uk

 

[denso13]

and had authority to act as he did

If he honestly believed he had been given permission by the owners to carry out the damage. Do you think he had their consent?

HAVING “LAWFUL EXCUSE”
Section 5 of the 1971 Act contains a defence of ‘lawful excuse’ to criminal damage charges under the following circumstances:

The person believed that they had the consent of the other to damage the property in question, or
The defendant caused the damage or destruction in self-defence and with reasonable force, or
If the damage was caused while protecting the property in question, the means taken to protect that property were not unreasonable, and the person honestly believed it needed protecting.

 

[noseall]

One man’s terrorist and all that.……. I’m sure you're not against the odd bit of lawbreaking when it suits you.

Nor am I sanctimonious true blue, either.

 

[Mottie]

Nor am I sanctimonious true blue, either.

Are these the posts of a sanctimonious true blue?

 

[motorbiking]

If he honestly believed he had been given permission by the owners to carry out the damage. Do you think he had their consent?

He doesn't have to prove that. Keep reading..

 

[denso13]

He doesn't have to prove that. Keep reading..

"The person believed that they had the consent of the other to damage the property in question, or
The defendant caused the damage or destruction in self-defence and with reasonable force, or
If the damage was caused while protecting the property in question, the means taken to protect that property were not unreasonable, and the person honestly believed it needed protecting."

 

[motorbiking]

Next bit. (hint: read s5(3))

 

[diy_fun_uk]

I think we're just going to see more and more of this. On Debate Night (a Scottish version of QT) they were discussing how a ULEZ zone is being considered for Glasgow centre (with a per entry fee) not sure if they mean as a replacement for the relatively new zone whereby you're fined if your vehicle doesn't comply. Maybe they're not making enough £££ from that scheme

Was also mentioned they're considering a charge to cross one (possibly more, not sure) of the Clyde bridges.

As I say we'll just see more and more of this. Per mile road charges, ULEZ zones, charges to use certain road infrastructure etc etc.