imamartain so you agree our system is not fit for propose
if so we can hardly have a go at another system
if so we can hardly have a go at another system
imamartain so you agree our system is not fit for propose
if so we can hardly have a go at another system
And what if you do slosh acid on someone and it turns out they didn't do it?
If someone is freed from prison for a wrongful conviction, then compensate them by all means, but then take away the £24,000 per year it has cost to keep them there. All in the interests of fairness.
If someone is freed from prison for a wrongful conviction, then compensate them by all means, but then take away the £24,000 per year it has cost to keep them there. All in the interests of fairness.
Lets get back back to an 'eye for an eye'....FFS.
Compo....thats all we hear about.
I believe this subject was about the perception of the phrase 'eye for an eye'
It's always argued about what if the man was innocent..........B*llocks ...that wasn't the question.
Lets talk principles.
B*llocks.calm down dear... it's only a forum .
F*ck all to do with it.Possible innocence might not have been the question, but it is the answer.... an eye for an eye is not valid without 100% proof of guilt....
even a signed confession is not 100% proof...
no seriously, calm down, you're coming across like a yob! it is only a forum!B*llocks.calm down dear... it's only a forum .
Lets talk principles.... are you saying that a man caught red handed throwing acid into your wife or daughters face (for example) you wouldn't want justice and proper retribution to be sought.....?????
I give up.
So you can't form a law on that premise !
So you can't form a law on that premise !
Well the Iranians do and a host of other countries and quite frankly I'm glad they have that freedom to do so.
Is it any wonder countries like these hate the west when they are being constantly preached too.
As if "our way" is somehow better.