I take note of those that hate women. Call it chivalry, if you like.Hilarious you post in a thread you have no interest in.
I take note of those that hate women. Call it chivalry, if you like.Hilarious you post in a thread you have no interest in.
Do you think the police would have prosecuted someone for making a “genuine mistake” in reporting something stolen?She felt it was a mistake to plead guilty. But you've decided that's a lie as well, as you do.
Do you think anyone else gives a shít, now that she's been held accountable?Do you think the police would have prosecuted someone for making a “genuine mistake” in reporting something stolen?
Do you think a lawyer would advise a guilty plea for an offence that requires deliberate criminal intent for a “genuine mistake”?
Do you think the same lawyer would advise no comment to an interview where the whole mistake and misunderstanding could be cleared up?
Perhaps, I have an open mind about it, but she's out anyway. You know all the answers, and every detail of what went on and what she was thinking, 10 years ago. As you always do.Perhaps the “genuine mistake” was committing the crime.
Don’t think starmer can sack the deputy. But he clearly has his eye on her. Must have been embarrassing having your deputy trash talking a company you are trying to do a deal with.Is Ange out yet?
It'll change when she gets out of jail.Don’t think starmer can sack the deputy.
Speaking of "mistakes "If you bother to read the offence you will see the offence is not making a false report as a “genuine mistake”. It’s knowingly making a false report.
Otherwise every witness who mistakenly recall events would be prosecuted.
No judge was involved. It was a magistrate’s court and all we know is that she received a conditional discharge.
Bloke - doesn't count for the boat boy.Speaking of "mistakes "
Nadhim Zahawi confirms nearly £5m paid for tax error
The ex-chancellor says he is sorry for not giving more details in his ministerial declaration.www.bbc.co.uk
hmrc seemed to have accepted at face value that there was no dishonesty.
The penalty was a civil penalty, not a criminal finding. I was asking why the matter didn't get referred for criminal investigation, and if it did why action wasn't takenWhat do you think caused the penalty assessment?
Innocent mistake? Or reckless lack of care?
I think he had to go because of a breach of the ministerial codeHe didn't get sacked for an innocent mistake
Mone ? Has she ?Do you think anyone else gives a shít, now that she's been held accountable?
Speaking of "mistakes "
Nadhim Zahawi confirms nearly £5m paid for tax error
The ex-chancellor says he is sorry for not giving more details in his ministerial declaration.www.bbc.co.uk
Bloke - doesn't count for the boat boy.
That will be a no then.Arrested, charged, pleaded guilty, convicted?
She's gone.A "genuine mistake"..
Louise Haigh's photo of stolen phone 'taken after alleged theft'
Sources tell Sky News that police officers became suspicious after suspecting that a photo Ms Haigh submitted of the handset was taken after the alleged theftnews.sky.com