Flood - tractor driver

[Munroast]

Or maybe he was just stupid. You'll be glad to know being stupid isn't illegal.

maybe, but being stupid of the law is no excuse

 

[motorbiking]

The bloke did a really stupid thing and must have known there would be consequences, enough to let the jury to decide. If it was a asylum seeker or traveler who’d stolen the tracktor, there would be no argument. A tweed jacket is no reason not to pursue a case

That will be the beak

Jury or magistrate? which are you going with?

 

[noseall]

Jury or magistrate? which are you going with?

I doubt it's up to blup or whether he gives a shít.

 

[blup]

Jury or magistrate? which are you going with?

Better chance of getting off with a magistrate and a mr loop hole lawyer running your argument.

 

[motorbiking]

Better chance of getting off with a magistrate and a mr loop hole lawyer running your argument.

Stats say otherwise. But even a magistrate will be able to get their head around the law, provided someone explains it to them.

 

[blup]

Stats say otherwise. But even a magistrate will be able to get their head around the law, provided someone explains it to them.

More likely they will be bamboozled by mr loophole running your argument.

 

[motorbiking]

The argument that criminal damage requires a criminal mindset. Who’d have thought.

 

[IT Minion]

The argument that criminal damage requires a criminal mindset. Who’d have thought.

Except when it doesn't?

Criminal damage can also be deemed as committed recklessly, which means there was no intention to cause criminal damage. A person acts recklessly with respect to:

A circumstance when they are aware of a risk that exists or will exist
In the circumstances known to them, it was unreasonable to take that risk

What is criminal damage? - Noble Solicitors

 

[motorbiking]

Already covered in the case law.