I can read your 'paper' elsewhere on the net. Probably from the same place you copied it from.
Then you have your evidence, so produce it! Prove your accusation was not fallacious. If you can.
I will be waiting for you to provide this evidence of plagiarism that you claim is so readily available on the internet.
The problem with this recent claim of yours, is that as you do not understand the subject, you do not know what to put into the search engine to look for information.
If you do not know what to look for, you will never find it.
If you cannot find it now, you never were able to find it.
If you were never able to find it, you were not in any position to make a credible accusation.
Which demonstrates that your accusation was flippant, spiteful, unwarranted, and controvertible.
As I said earlier, you might be experienced and accomplished as a keyboard warrior, but as a man, you lack substance and integrity.
If you have no wish to prove your accusation was appropriate, (which you cannot, because it was not), at least take the opportunity to prove me wrong. Then you will be the hero of the herd of your attack dogs, such as blightymam, mitch, transam, doggit, etc., who appear to have become your mouthpiece as well.
Perhaps they are your relatives that you referred to, halfwit relatives:
When I mentioned RH in your other thread, I was referring to relative halfwit
Perhaps halfwit is genetic in your family.