4000m below the surface? Jeepers! That is hostile territory, right there.
Allegedly some timed device triggers a resurface after x hours, however lots of dependancies here, redundancy and resilience didn't seem relevant factors in it's design.I'm surprised that it doesn't have a safety feature that it would naturally rise to the surface.
Andy
Rapid decompression?
Lol I very much doubt that - more likely they will make a Netflix documentary.I hope they are saved, and then, bearing in mind how rich they are, they pay back the costs of the rescue.
400m is hostile territory let alone 4000m.4000m below the surface? Jeepers! That is hostile territory, right there.
I can't understand why it would be designed such that the door is bolted shut from the outside.
Once you're more than a few metres down, water pressure alone would make it physically impossible to shove open from inside anyway.
If it's a sealed system - which I think it is - no, as they're breathing air at normal atmospheric pressure.
A testament of how difficult it is we have made way more journeys into space than into the deep ocean trenches.
I heard on the radio just now from someone that had been on it that the ballast release method is crude to say the least. It is on the outside of the submersible and is released by tipping the sub to one side. This is achieved by everybody inside moving to one side and then to the other!I'm surprised that it doesn't have a safety feature that it would naturally rise to the surface.
Andy
I heard on the radio just now from someone that had been on it that the ballast release method is crude to say the least. It is on the outside of the submersible and is released by tipping the sub to one side. This is achieved by everybody inside moving to one side and then to the other!