If the BBC invited him on to do a hatchet job

[noseall]

That would be the legal ones you're talking about then.

Sorry, do you have figures to show to the contrary? Can we see them please?

 

[sooey]

That would be the legal ones you're talking about then.

Sorry, do you have figures to show to the contrary? Can we see them please?

Most of the illegal ones tend not to show their passports on the way in soft lad.

 

[noseall]

Most of the illegal ones tend not to show their passports on the way in soft lad.

........or their religious orientation.

Put it another way, immigration figures for China, India, USA and Australia and a couple of other non-Muslim prevalent nations accounts for about a quarter of a million migrants. Are you saying that illegal Muslim (UK bound) migrants outweigh this number?

 

[noseall]

I talk mainly about muslim immigration at present because that is where most non EU immigration is coming from. If it was hindu's I'd be talking about them. If it was budhists I'd be talking about them etc.

Just in case you'd forgotten.

 

[JohnD]

Most of the illegal ones tend not to show their passports on the way in soft lad.

How do you know that?

Or are you just guessing?

 

[DRM]

You might not like what he says, but should he have been arrested for saying it.

Strange how there was no mention of his arrest in the Daily Politics clip!

 

[JohnD]

DRM in the clip you posted, at 2.30 the Sydney speaker says "to be arrested for quoting a 120 year old document"... "first of all he was arrested for incitement disturbance of the peace sort of thing"..."they changed the charge and made it about racial discrimination with a bit of religious intolerance thrown in he faces up to two years in prison"

DRM do you believe that any of those is a true statement?

 

[noseall]

The RWR with believe anything, as long as it suits their agenda.

Gullible.

Naïve.

Blinkered.

 

[JohnD]

I know they spread it, but are you sure they believe it?

 

[handyjack]

You might not like what he says, but should he have been arrested for saying it.

Strange how there was no mention of his arrest in the Daily Politics clip!

No he should not, but that did happen a while ago.

Link

 

[noseall]

I know they spread it, but are you sure they believe it?

Of course they don't believe it John, you'd have to be monumentally stupid, surely?

 

[DRM]

DRM in the clip you posted, at 2.30 the Sydney speaker says "to be arrested for quoting a 120 year old document"... "first of all he was arrested for incitement disturbance of the peace sort of thing"..."they changed the charge and made it about racial discrimination with a bit of religious intolerance thrown in he faces up to two years in prison"

DRM do you believe that any of those is a true statement?

The British Media would not touch it, it was all hushed up.

Was the establishment involved in this cover up?

If so, I wonder why.

BTW, read the comments under these videos.

 

[JohnD]

I suppose that's a "no."

I wonder why you published a video crammed full of false claims.

Trying to stir up hatred, I suppose.

 

[DRM]

I suppose that's a "no."

I wonder why you published a video crammed full of false claims.

Trying to stir up hatred, I suppose.

Please refer to my original reply!

 

[JohnD]

The British Media would not touch it, it was all hushed up.

You mean, apart from the Mail, the Express, the Telegraph, the BBC, the Hampshire Chronicle, Dorset Live....

Hushed up my asre.

No wonder you had to scour the world to find an Australian nutter who wants to spread a false and misleading story you could circulate.

And you say you know the claims were not true but you decided to circulate them anyway.