Imagine A World Without Religion

[Vinty]

I detest people that hate women..
You people make me sick.

Your are sick, hatred makes you sick.

 

[noseall]

hatred makes you sick.

No.
Hatred of women sickens me. Why is it that you hate them so much?

 

[Justin Passing]

You could be describing yourself there.
I am not particularly religious.

Your grasp of basic biology seems as suspect as Nosealls.
Noseall believes that unborn children don't exist , they are just unfertilised embryos according to him.

I point out where you're wrong,
and you say I'm illogical, without any reason why. I've given you the logic of the error in what you said. Where's yours?

You're coming up with more and more unsubstantiated drivel. You have allowed your inteligence to be corrupted.
You say you aren't particularly religious.
You either are or you're not . Do you call yourself a jew or a christian or something similar? If so, you're religious.
"Not particularly" is drivel, as in "Is the wife pregnant? "Not particularly" ".
That's rubbish of the type you're coming out with.
You appear to have abrogated your responsibility for intelligent thought, but won't see it - it's self fulfilling.
It's like you put your fingers in your ears and say "lalalalala god is right god is right lalalalala god is right god is right...... "
when the only god is in your head because you put it there.

It zeroes the value of anything you say on these matters, and potentially all others.

 

[Vinty]

I point out where you're wrong,
and you say I'm illogical, without any reason why. I've given you the logic of the error in what you said. Where's yours?

You're coming up with more and more unsubstantiated drivel. You have allowed your inteligence to be corrupted.
You say you aren't particularly religious.
You either are or you're not . Do you call yourself a jew or a christian or something similar? If so, you're religious.
"Not particularly" is drivel, as in "Is the wife pregnant? "Not particularly" ".
That's rubbish of the type you're coming out with.
You appear to have abrogated your responsibility for intelligent thought, but won't see it - it's self fulfilling.
It's like you put your fingers in your ears and say "lalalalala god is right god is right lalalalala god is right god is right...... "
when the only god is in your head because you put it there.

It zeroes the value of anything you say on these matters, and potentially all others.

You talk ****e.
Sorry.

 

[Vinty]

No.
Hatred of women sickens me. Why is it that you hate them so much?

Why do you get so angry on behalf of women.
Do you have their permission.

 

[noseall]

Why do you get so angry on behalf of women.

How come you don't?

 

[Vinty]

How come you don't?

Both lives matter.
Pregnancy isn't a disease curable by surgery.

 

[Vinty]

You say you aren't particularly religious.
You either are or you're not . Do you call yourself a jew or a christian or something similar? If so, you're religious

Pregnancy and religious belief are not comparable.
Pregnancy is a scientific truth which is 100% provable.

Religious belief is based on faith because there is no evidence either way for the existence or non existence of God.

Some people have a very strong faith , while others not so strong a faith, a lot of people have no belief whatsoever.

So when I say not particularly religious, I mean not particularly religious in the sense of observance and practice of religion along with associated rites ect.

Is someone who only attends church for weddings and funerals as religious as the Pope.

 

[noseall]

Both lives matter.

Obviously not, or you wouldn't be such an ardent anti-abortionist nutter. Forcing women to carry full term can have fatal consequences for the women.

 

[Vinty]

. Forcing women to carry full term can have fatal consequences.

Who for.

 

[securespark]

For old George next door.

Who do you think?

There can be consequences for Mother and baby, of course.

 

[noseall]

Who for.

Restricting access to abortion is a cruel, backwards and idiotic endeavour that puts women and girls at risk. Only the very stupidest people would even consider it.

You anti-abortionists make me sick.

 

[Justin Passing]

Religious belief is based on faith because there is no evidence either way for the existence or non existence of God.

You could say the same for fairies. Perhaps you aren't particularly a believer in fairies either.
There is no evidence that there are no fairies living at the bottom of my garden.
You're conflating "religous" with degree of adherence to doctrine. It's clutching at straws.
You can't weasel yourself into a sustainable position that way.
Are you some sort of christian? If so you are, 100%, religious.
Do you believe that life has some sort of spiritual or other invented quality - if so then you're religious.

If you think life is anything other than the inevitable result of having chemicals and energy, you're believing in something imaginary, like fairies.
It's often described with weasel words. Religiousness will do. Mythologist will do, fantasist will also do. Superstitious is spot on.

You have decided - or, it was probably drummed into you as a kid - to believe in something entirely imaginary, which you are letting influence your thinking. It appears to have closed off that part of objective thought which would allow you to see it.
Therefore it's self-sustaining, and you will come up with a continous stream of claptrap to maintain it - you're well down that road already.
It's just like every other sort of hocus pocus people allow to have traction in their world.

a lot of people have no belief whatsoever.

That's a typically stupid thing afflicted people come up with in a feeble attempt to be pejorative.
It's not a question of having no belief, its having no belief in imaginary twaddle. Yes a lot of people have no belief in imaginary twaddle.
But you do have that.

As you said, there's no evidence for existence of god. You behave as though such a belief to any degree, is admissible. No, it's just silliness.
What's next, leprechauns?

 

[fixitflav]

there is no evidence either way for the existence or non existence of God.

That's a false argument. The onus is on theists to show that god exists, not on atheists to show he doesn't.

 

[Odds]

You could say the same for fairies. Perhaps you aren't particularly a believer in fairies either.
There is no evidence that there are no fairies living at the bottom of my garden.
You're conflating "religous" with degree of adherence to doctrine. It's clutching at straws.
You can't weasel yourself into a sustainable position that way.
Are you some sort of christian? If so you are, 100%, religious.
Do you believe that life has some sort of spiritual or other invented quality - if so then you're religious.

If you think life is anything other than the inevitable result of having chemicals and energy, you're believing in something imaginary, like fairies.
It's often described with weasel words. Religiousness will do. Mythologist will do, fantasist will also do. Superstitious is spot on.

You have decided - or, it was probably drummed into you as a kid - to believe in something entirely imaginary, which you are letting influence your thinking. It appears to have closed off that part of objective thought which would allow you to see it.
Therefore it's self-sustaining, and you will come up with a continous stream of claptrap to maintain it - you're well down that road already.
It's just like every other sort of hocus pocus people allow to have traction in their world.


That's a typically stupid thing afflicted people come up with in a feeble attempt to be pejorative.
It's not a question of having no belief, its having no belief in imaginary twaddle. Yes a lot of people have no belief in imaginary twaddle.
But you do have that.

As you said, there's no evidence for existence of god. You behave as though such a belief to any degree, is admissible. No, it's just silliness.
What's next, leprechauns?

I assume you believe the world will be better off without religion - In what, then, do you believe, if not God?