I can understand how the term ****** could easily offend someone with a condition. However other than his physical problems I would say that securespark actually seems quite lucid and fairly compos mentis so in effect that particular comment cannot actually be seen to relate to him (and you sir)..
The term ****** has more than one meaning , one medical and another as a derogatory remark against people with a medical condition but equally as a term to describe someone who is not medically a ****** but is just someone who has acted like a fool.
I can understand why these terms could cause offence but there needs to be a term within the emglish language to berate someone who acts stupid.
The term idiot is often used but is also a medical term relating to someone with a low IQ.
I suppose fool is ok but is somehow a bit weak
As a young lad locally we used to berate people with the word 'menner' which was in relation to a local mental institution in the town of 'Menston'
I guess we could look for suggestions for another abusive term to describe someone who has behaved in a way to suggest they hadn't thought things out very well...
any suggestions for a modern alternative...?
How about Blairite?
You see, this is the kind of argument I am looking for -
My problem is that using a term that describes a disability as a form of abuse is offensive whether is is directed at me or not.
For example, when I was young,' Spastic' was from a medical term and acceptable but as time went on it became used as a form of abuse.
When directed at someone who did not have a medical condition, then its use implied that there was something 'wrong ' with a section of people.
Society as a whole decided to move on as the language evolved and replaced this term with another, and park the word 'Spastic'.
(I have heard my sons use the term 'spaz' when rowing and asked them what they thoguht it meant etc etc but that's another story. I still hear 'Mongol' being used in another context, but that is mostly generational)
Liikewise '******' is meant to imply that the person on the receiving end has some form of learning difficulty.
If one feels that its okay to use that kind of disablity as a peg to hang one's insults on, then I would say the user has a very limited awareness of the use of language and its effects.
This may be a lack of education or awareness rather than deliberate. So the onus is on the rest of us to make people aware and hope that they have the tools to take it on .
Many people behave stupidly, or do stupid things occasionally. Myself included. However, if I was called a '******' or similar I would not so much feel personally insulted as annoyed that someone was using a group of people's disability in this way .
The test for me is would you use the word in front of a person who you classed as being in that group?
Anyway, thanks for making some decent points, skyboy