Is Jewish and/or Zionism a Racist Ideology?

express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed organisation (section 12(1A))

That'll do.
 
Sponsored Links
You're missing the point.


If the "feds" kick your door down, what's your defence going to be?
"Motorbiking's a wrong 'un as well!"


:D
The feds won't be kicking my door down, and I won't be needing to offer a defence.
There;s been no criminal activity. It's just motorbiking exercising his freedom to express himself.
He's really hoping to influence the mods to silence my freedom of expression because he doesn't like what I say, and he has a bee in his bonnet over previous issues.
He's been proven to misrepresent the law to favour his political opinion.
He did it numerous times during the trans discussion.
 
you understand that each item is an offence in its own right? There are no "and"s after each line (mainly because they are listed separately in the act.

@fillyboy - yup exactly s12 nailed

@Roy Bloom - I don't care what the mods think of you. I suspect you don't live in the UK and think you are immune. You are mistaken.
 
Sponsored Links
you understand that each item is an offence in its own right? There are no "and"s after each line (mainly because they are listed separately in the act.

@fillyboy - yup exactly s12 nailed

@Roy Bloom - I don't care what the mods think of you. I suspect you don't live in the UK and think you are immune. You are mistaken.

I thought the law breaking jew hater was banned from this thread?
 
you understand that each item is an offence in its own right? There are no "and"s after each line (mainly because they are listed separately in the act.

@fillyboy - yup exactly s12 nailed
Stop being so infantile, you'll only end up making a fool of yourself.... again.
 
I thought the law breaking jew hater was banned from this thread?
Dishonest accusations coming thick and fast now, from the thick and slow. :rolleyes:

They can't discuss an issue, so they resort to ad hominem attacks, as usual.
 
Last edited:
you understand that each item is an offence in its own right? There are no "and"s after each line (mainly because they are listed separately in the act.

@fillyboy - yup exactly s12 nailed

@Roy Bloom - I don't care what the mods think of you. I suspect you don't live in the UK and think you are immune. You are mistaken.

I thought the law breaking jew hater was banned from this thread?

Let me know when you find anything that fits. :rolleyes:

1698685491340.png
 

Any reasonable person would see the problems with:
- Challenging the proscribed status of a terrorist organisation
- Defending their actions on the basis that they are defending their legitimate aims.
- referring to them as a legitimate political party
- directing people to their propaganda and policies

Your arguments with Denso and Notch are perfect examples of the above.
 
would that be the defence of academic comment? I couldn't find that in the version of the Terrorism Act I read.
 

Any reasonable person would see the problems with:
- Challenging the proscribed status of a terrorist organisation
- Defending their actions on the basis that they are defending their legitimate aims.
- referring to them as a legitimate political party
- directing people to their propaganda and policies

Your arguments with Denso and Notch are perfect examples of the above.

Clearly Himmie has those “special privileges” he constantly whines about others having :ROFLMAO:

would that be the defence of academic comment? I couldn't find that in the version of the Terrorism Act I read.

Let me know when you find anything that fits. :rolleyes:
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top