Is Jewish and/or Zionism a Racist Ideology?

The UN do not designate Hamas as terrorists.
Does that mean they were taught by their parents and their peers? :rolleyes:

The labelling of an organisation as terrorists is a political ploy.

Are we going to go over the same ground all over again?
You accept they are a proscribed terrorist organisation and that expressing support for such is a criminal offence?
 
Sponsored Links
You accept they are a proscribed terrorist organisation and that expressing support for such is a criminal offence?
Your implicatioins are wasted and disengenuine.
You are aware that conspiracy to destroy public property is a criminal offence?
 
The UN do not designate Hamas as terrorists.
Does that mean they were taught by their parents and their peers
The UN is a committee which includes quite a few Muslim states who no doubt were taught that by their parents....just like you.
 
Sponsored Links
Himmie is going to jail
he is clearly posting support for a proscribed terrorist organisation and if it were my site, I'd be worried about my own exposure. but on the other hand I quite enjoy laughing at his posts.
 
The UN is a committee which includes quite a few Muslim states who no doubt were taught that by their parents....just like you.
56 out of 193. So even if all Muslim countries voted against a resolution, it would still pass, by the non Muslim countries. :rolleyes:

The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation founded in 1969 has 57 members, 56 of which are also member states of the United Nations, with 48 countries being Muslim majority countries.
There are currently 193 UN Member States. Each of the Member States of the United Nations has one seat in the General Assembly. Information about current members, growth of membership since 1945, the procedure on how a country becomes a member, and the membership of principal UN organs is provided below.

Christian countries are not always designated as such if they have no state church, e.g. USA.

But yoiur dishonest implication is noted. Were you taught that as a discussion tactic from a young age?
 
he is clearly posting support for a proscribed terrorist organisation and if it were my site, I'd be worried about my own exposure. but on the other hand I quite enjoy laughing at his posts.
No doubt you've been pressing the report button for all you're worth.
Unless you can find one of my comments expressing support for Hamas, you're wasting your time, and mine and the mods.

Your posts are not funny, they illustrate your dishonesty by resorting to outlandish lies.
That's a sad indictment on you.
 
Actually, I haven't reported any of your posts. As I said they make me laugh. I don't own or run the site, it's not for me to take action against posters who break the law.

The fact is - if you make public post defending Hamas, justify their actions, challenge their status as a terrorist organisation and live in the UK - you are breaking the law, whether you agree or not, its a fact.
 
Actually, I haven't reported any of your posts. As I said they make me laugh. I don't own or run the site, it's not for me to take action against posters who break the law.

The fact is - if you make public post defending Hamas, justify their actions, challenge their status as a terrorist organisation and live in the UK - you are breaking the law, whether you agree or not, its a fact.
If you express support for destroying public property and suggest ways to avoid detection you are conspiring to commit a criminal offence.
If you foment hatred against asylum seekers by posting false comments, you may be committing an offence.

If you make dishionest accusations against other posters you're probably breaking the rules. But none of the above has ever stopped you before,.

Have you got that beam out of your eye yet? :rolleyes:

And you being an advocate for free speech an'all.
motorbiking said:
I believe in free speech as long as its lawfully expressed.
 
Last edited:
If you express support for destroying public property and suggest ways to avoid detection you are conspiring to commit a criminal offence.
more Boll@x from you... clearly you aren't remotely aware of the law you are trying to quote.

Let me help you with the legal test for conspiracy

To prove a conspiracy, the prosecution must be able to show:

An agreement has been made between two or more parties
- The agreement is to commit a criminal offence
- There was an intention to be a party to an agreement to do an unlawful act
- That a defendant and one other party knew or intended that the elements of the intended offence would exist at the time of the offence

If you foment hatred against asylum seekers by posting false comments, you may be committing an offence.
No problem with asylum seekers - I do have a problem with illegal immigrant trafficking gangs who break the law. and of course anyone who comes to the UK illegally via a small boat has no right to claim asylum.
 
Last edited:
If you express support for destroying public property and suggest ways to avoid detection you are conspiring to commit a criminal offence.
If you foment hatred against asylum seekers by posting false comments, you may be committing an offence.


You're missing the point.


If the "feds" kick your door down, what's your defence going to be?
"Motorbiking's a wrong 'un as well!"


:D
 
more Boll@x from you... clearly you aren't remotely aware of the law you are trying to quote.

Let me help you with the legal test for conspiracy

To prove a conspiracy, the prosecution must be able to show:

An agreement has been made between two or more parties
- The agreement is to commit a criminal offence
- There was an intention to be a party to an agreement to do an unlawful act
- That a defendant and one other party knew or intended that the elements of the intended offence would exist at the time of the offence


No problem with asylum seekers - I do have a problem with illegal immigrant trafficking gangs who break the law. and of course anyone who comes to the UK illegally via a small boat has no right to claim asylum.
more Boll@x from you... clearly you aren't remotely aware of the law you are trying to quote.

Let me help yolu with proving expression of support for Hamas.

To prove support for a terrorist organisation, the prosecution must be able to show:
  • belong, or profess to belong, to a proscribed organisation in the UK or overseas (section 11 of the Act)
  • invite support for a proscribed organisation (the support invited need not be material support, such as the provision of money or other property, and can also include moral support or approval) (section 12(1))
  • express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation, reckless as to whether a person to whom the expression is directed will be encouraged to support a proscribed organisation (section 12(1A))
  • arrange, manage or assist in arranging or managing a meeting in the knowledge that the meeting is to support or further the activities of a proscribed organisation, or is to be addressed by a person who belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organisation (section 12(2)); or to address a meeting if the purpose of the address is to encourage support for, or further the activities of, a proscribed organisation (section 12(3))
  • wear clothing or carry or display articles in public in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that the individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation (section 13)
  • publish an image of an item of clothing or other article, such as a flag or logo, in the same circumstances (section 13(1A))
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top