The general convention seems to be that no installation method reduces CCC by more than 50% in comparison with Method C ('clipped direct') and that Method 103 (surrounded by thermal insulation in a stud wall) reduces it to exactly 50% of the figure for Method C.To my knowledge there isn't an installation method that can't supply 32A on 6mm,
Method C 6mm² has a CCC of 47A (per BS7671 Table 4D5), hence only 23.5A for Method 103 - and also only 27A for Method 101.
Of course, I think it's possible that those figures could be reduced further by other 'de-rating factors'(such as 'grouping' etc.)
Kind Regards,John