Under the UN definition it is, beause it commits acts of terror.It is?
Under the carefully crafted western definition, it can't be.
Under the UN definition it is, beause it commits acts of terror.It is?
Yes, exactly, UK has exploited domestic law to cover its politically motivated designation of terrorists.Hamas are a designated terrorist group - if you publish anything to support them - you are committing a criminal offence, in the UK.
Under the carefully crafted western definition.Of course
Russia is a terrorist state today, although really it’s the Putin regime.
Although states and countries aren’t really called terrorist as such
Nonsense. I have never expressed support for Hamas.You wonder beyond your usual boll@x, if you are residing in the UK you are on dodgy ground.
Under the UN definition it very definitely is terrorism.Well certainly the State of Israel has engaged in state-sponsored terrorism
but Israel doesn’t really commit random, indiscriminate acts of terror, mostly it’s the army fighting in retaliation. I guess over the years state Israel has committed oppression rather than terror.
what Israel are doing at the moment is not terrorism, even if it’s not justified.
Although the term is not subject to a universally agreed definition, terrorism can be broadly understood as a method of coercion that utilizes or threatens to utilize violence in order to spread fear and thereby attain political or ideological goals
As palestinians are seen as the aggressor despite decades of atrocities.I can understand the urge for revenge but Israel must come to realise sending troops backed by overwhelming air power and tanks can only make things much worse. As soon as the world gets first hand accounts of burning children and blasted homes, Israel will be seen as the aggressor, despite being the victim of a terrible atrocity.
You are challenging their status as a prescribed terrorist organisation, you are accusing the UK of "exploit[ing] domestic law to cover its politically motivated designation of terrorists." You post this on an online forum, you are committing an offence.
Terrorism Act 2000
An Act to make provision about terrorism; and to make temporary provision for Northern Ireland about the prosecution and punishment of certain offences, the preservation of peace and the maintenance of order.www.legislation.gov.uk
Nonsense, I am declaring an academic opinion, and illustrating how and why UN do not designate Hamas as a terrorist organisation, and how and why UK exploits its domestic law to eradicate and prevent justifiable opposition to its policies.You are challenging their status as a prescribed terrorist organisation, you are accusing the UK of "exploit[ing] domestic law to cover its politically motivated designation of terrorists." You post this on an online forum, you are committing an offence.
Terrorism Act 2000
An Act to make provision about terrorism; and to make temporary provision for Northern Ireland about the prosecution and punishment of certain offences, the preservation of peace and the maintenance of order.www.legislation.gov.uk
If we go back only to the UN awarding Israel land for its people, it was unfair and inequitable from that point onNo idea. I only work here, man.
Maybe they can look back in history when Canaan and the Kingdom of Judea were a thing. Split north-south, perhaps Jerusalem declared an open city. No matter which solution you prefer someone, somewhere will object and off we go again.
According to the UN, Hamas is not a designated terrorist organistion.So according to you Hamas should not be a prescribed terrorist organisation because the "UK exploits its domestic law to eradicate and prevent justifiable opposition to its policies."?
There's always going to be at least one:I suspect the reason is complex, maybe too complex for this forum, because some dishonest poster is bound to misinterpret what I'm about to present:
Hamas are a designated terrorist group - if you publish anything to support them - you are committing a criminal offence, in the UK.