Israel under attack

Sponsored Links
So IDF saying multiple rockets and CG saying a single rocket?

Schrodingers Rocket, it can be many and one at the same time.
 
Sponsored Links
I thought it was in the South, so why did they choose not to evacuate it?
Imagine if your local hospital was told to do that...

Could you tell us how you can evacuate hospitalised people at short notice with nowhere to go for ongoing treatment?
 
Lol still going with that?

Man you need to shake your head.

Well, its all pointing that way according to many outlets....

You seriously think that Israel would target a hospital?

You need to shake your head if you do!
 
The IDF said in a statement that an analysis "an operational systems indicates that a barrage of rockets was fired by terrorists in Gaza, passing in close proximity to the Al Ahli hospital in Gaza at the time it was hit."
  • "Intelligence from multiple sources we have in our hands indicates that Islamic Jihad is responsible for the failed rocket launch which hit the hospital in Gaza," the statement added.
  • Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said "the entire world needs to know — the barbaric terrorist in Gaza are the ones who attacked the hospital and not the IDF. Those who killed our children are killing their own children."
  • The PIJ has not immediately responded to the IDF's claim.
  • Hamas leader Ismail Haniya said the "hospital massacre" was "a turning point" and called the Palestinians in the occupied West Bank to confront Israeli soldiers and settlers.
 
I doubt that the type of rockets used by Hamas are capable of causing carnage on this scale.
 
Whats happening in Gaza isn't a military operation.
Its extermination.
 
4170.jpg


The Israeli public is fiercely divided over how the state has handled the major breach of its security, with the issue of the hostages becoming a lightning rod for criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu’s response to the crisis.

Tzvia Shmuelvich, who served in the Israeli military during the 1973 war against a coalition of neighbouring states, said: “Even the head of the army, the chief of the Shin Bet [domestic intelligence service] said ‘we are guilty, we take responsibility, we admit we are to blame’ – that they failed. But Netanyahu, he never fails.

Other veterans of Israel’s compulsory military service joined in the criticism. “He caused the problem,” said one man, overhearing people’s complaints about the increasingly right-wing Israeli government that many on the left consider beholden to religious and extremist settler groups. “He didn’t cause the problem, he is is the problem,” said Avi Gopher. “This is the opposite of what Israel needs. Every day, every minute, that he’s in power is an issue.”

The Guardian.com
 
Because some resort to dishonesty, fake news and one-sided arguments, it's good to refute, disprove their falsehoods, and to offer an alternative viewpoint.
But trolling is supposedly not allowed. If someone acts like a complete idiot to test my patience, responding to them is not mandatory.
For now I give them the benefit of the doubt. When and if I'm convinced that they are just trolling, I may or may not respond.

Some idiot thinks this isn't proof that UN do not consider Hamas as terrorists.


It's there, plain as daylight.
Maybe the five syllable words confused them :rolleyes:
Clearly you’ve not read the article

regarding A/73L.42

1) the resolution was put forward by USA, and votes wouldve been rather like Eurovision, ie USA haters voted against on principle

2) it was not a resolution on whether or not to designate Hamas as terrirists, so doesn’t support your argument

3) the resolution was voted for 87 in favour to 57 against -so UN general assembly voted majority in favour

4) have a look at those who voted against: haters of Israel, Kuwait, Iran, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Bahrain, Afghanistan


its back to the drawing board for Himmie Hamas
 
I suppose supporting the Hamas evil terrorist group is an alternative viewpoint….just a very bad one
Anyone who proposes “alternative views” on proscribed terrorists, which defend and support them. Needs to recognise they are breaking the law. In the U.K. at least.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who proposes “alternative views” on prescribed terrorists, which defend and support them. Needs to recognise they are breaking the law. In the U.K. at least.
How can a terrorist be 'prescribed'...

Are they available on the NHS?
 
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top