It's OK to kill journalists

Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links

Is this motorbiking source of information?

Or has he been listening to his friend Karen?
 
YouTube are making a few pennies out of Johnnyboy tonight. I bet Facebook are fuming.

The pro-Slaughter propagandists usually say they won't look at Facebook and have no idea what atrocities are reported.
 
Motorbiking loves to sneer.

I suspect he just wants to support a struggling organisation that only pays its UK staff an avg. £260k per year. Putting them well and truly in the 1% of UK employees who pay 28% of all income tax and around 39% of their income. Facebook UK also managed keep most of its £3.3bn of UK sales away from the tax man.

Good to see JohnD supporting the top 1% of earners and their tax efficient employers.. I didn't know he had it in him.
 
I wonder how long motorbiking thinks it will take Israel to complete the final solution to the problem of news reports that don't follow the Israeli line?

Maybe Regev and his ilk will be the only survivors, and motorbiking will see nothing to challenge his racist prejudices.

"Israel has totally sealed off the territory, refusing to grant permission for foreign journalists to enter the war zone. At the same time, at least 53 media workers have been killed in the war since 7 October, making it the deadliest conflict for reporters since the Committee to Protect Journalists began collecting data in 1992.

"You have a situation where you’re killing most of the registered journalists in Gaza, [and] you’re not letting other journalists in," Sharif Abdel Kouddous, an independent journalist who worked on an award-winning film about Israel’s killing of Al Jazeera correspondent Shireen Abu Akleh in May 2022, said in an interview with Democracy Now."
 

"Caught in the crossfire"

You'll hear that one quite often.

Even about the elderly ladies who stepped out of a church and were shot by Israeli snipers.
(Despite the false claims of the Israeli Spokeswoman that there are no churches and no Christians)

The Pope disagrees with her.
 
"That was a mistake "

= "ooops, you've caught me

Although a moment ago I claimed to know nothing about it"

 
"You're stretching my credulity"

= "Don't keep lying to me, Redev"

 
.
because its disputed and I don't believe there are no pro Hamas journalists, embedded in the organisation. The fact is (as shown here) almost everyone has an opinion on who is be being more barbaric than the other. It stands to reason that both are pushing propaganda through the media of their choosing.

Hasbara is a propaganda tool that works quite well in societies that assume they are talking to truthful people.

And it is very effective… up to a point. The reason why it will ultimately fail is that it has very poor material to work with. You cannot behave like psychopaths and disguise it forever. You cannot trample other peoples’ rights and freedoms, destroy their property, and expect to be loved. You cannot keep your jackboot on your neighbour’s neck for 75 years and expect to call yourself civilised and in tune with Western values. You cannot steal his lands, water and livelihood at gunpoint and claim the moral high ground.
 
"Israel has been blamed for the bombing of the Al-Ahli hospital in northern Gaza. At the time of publication, the attack had killed hundreds of people.

Israel has claimed it was a Palestinian rocket that hit the hospital. But many people are accusing Israel of lying – and it wouldn’t be a surprise if it was. Because in 2014, it used the exact same arguments when it killed dozens of people at a UN shelter.

Al-Ahli hospital: Israel’s ever-changing story
Israel has repeatedly changed its story over what was clearly its attack on the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital. In the immediate aftermath, media advisor to Benjamin Netanyahu Hananya Naftali tweeted that it was an Israeli airstrike that hit the hospital. However, he then quickly deleted it:"



 
Oops, I 'm being filmed.

We'd better kill some more journalists to stop that happening again.

 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top