Ivor Caplin arrested

Sponsored Links
It was a failure of the police not the CPS

It would help you if you researched the difference between the police and the CPS.
The CPS report says it's both.

The CPS has the power and responsibility to push the police to go get more evidence or check again with witnesses. The CPS should have done so but failed to do so.

On the face of it, the allegations made were both serious and
credible; the prosecutor should have recognised this and
sought to “build” a prosecution. In particular, there were
aspects of what he was told by the police as to the reasons that
the victims did not want to give evidence which should have
caused him to ask further questions. Instead, he appears to
have treated the obstacles as fatal to the prospects of a
prosecution taking place.
 
The CPS report says it's both.

The CPS has the power and responsibility to push the police to go get more evidence or check again with witnesses. The CPS should have done so but failed to do so.
It’s not much of a leap from that to, Keir knowing and saying “shush” from the shadows.

The bbc knew too.
 
Dunno how accurate it is ?? But there is list on face ache of over 50 named labour councillors that have been involved in abuse / grooming activity ??

Blimey worst than the church :giggle: Needs to be an enquiry into that may be ?
 
Sponsored Links
It’s not much of a leap from that to, Keir knowing and saying “shush” from the shadows.

The bbc knew too.
It really ****ing is. They review in the region of a million offenses a year and they don't charge between 10-30% of those (around 10% against Police advise, higher when the police are ambivalent). There's around 3,500 CPS lawyers.

The head of a 7,000 strong company is not going to review hundreds of rejected cases every working day.
 
It really ****ing is. They review in the region of a million offenses a year and they don't charge between 10-30% of those (around 10% against Police advise, higher when the police are ambivalent). There's around 3,500 CPS lawyers.

The head of a 7,000 strong company is not going to review hundreds of rejected cases every working day.
So you say.

I don’t agree.
 
Of course not, you don't like him so you think he's incompetent. A charge no one who has ever worked with him has made.
I’ve nothing more against him than any politician. Labour, conservatives etc.

He turned a blind eye, the report was destroyed.

We can’t all agree
 
I’ve nothing more against him than any politician. Labour, conservatives etc.

He turned a blind eye, the report was destroyed.

We can’t all agree
Except your opinion is based on ignorance and assumptions rather than anything approaching evidence. Not all opinions are equally valid or valuable.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top