- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,599
- Reaction score
- 2,417
- Country
I wouldn't expect anything less.I do, it think it’s part of a cover up.
I wouldn't expect anything less.I do, it think it’s part of a cover up.
The CPS report says it's both.It was a failure of the police not the CPS
It would help you if you researched the difference between the police and the CPS.
On the face of it, the allegations made were both serious and
credible; the prosecutor should have recognised this and
sought to “build” a prosecution. In particular, there were
aspects of what he was told by the police as to the reasons that
the victims did not want to give evidence which should have
caused him to ask further questions. Instead, he appears to
have treated the obstacles as fatal to the prospects of a
prosecution taking place.
It’s not much of a leap from that to, Keir knowing and saying “shush” from the shadows.The CPS report says it's both.
The CPS has the power and responsibility to push the police to go get more evidence or check again with witnesses. The CPS should have done so but failed to do so.
No I don't think so. A lone wolf I suspect.
It really ****ing is. They review in the region of a million offenses a year and they don't charge between 10-30% of those (around 10% against Police advise, higher when the police are ambivalent). There's around 3,500 CPS lawyers.It’s not much of a leap from that to, Keir knowing and saying “shush” from the shadows.
The bbc knew too.
So you say.It really ****ing is. They review in the region of a million offenses a year and they don't charge between 10-30% of those (around 10% against Police advise, higher when the police are ambivalent). There's around 3,500 CPS lawyers.
The head of a 7,000 strong company is not going to review hundreds of rejected cases every working day.
Of course not, you don't like him so you think he's incompetent. A charge no one who has ever worked with him has made.So you say.
I don’t agree.
I’ve nothing more against him than any politician. Labour, conservatives etc.Of course not, you don't like him so you think he's incompetent. A charge no one who has ever worked with him has made.
The head of a 7,000 strong company is not going to review hundreds of rejected cases every working day.
You’d think so.But as the head, he surly must bear the responsibility for decisions made by the staff he oversees.
That's how it normally works isn't it?
You’d think so.
He seems a little put out I won’t lap up his opinionThe Minion seems to think the opposite is true, extraordinary.
Except your opinion is based on ignorance and assumptions rather than anything approaching evidence. Not all opinions are equally valid or valuable.I’ve nothing more against him than any politician. Labour, conservatives etc.
He turned a blind eye, the report was destroyed.
We can’t all agree