D
durhamplumber
.
It hasn't in a lot of places - Spain, Peru for example.Well, you are free to believe that. But explain this - why have death rate been lower in countries with more severe lockdowns?
Sorry.(I bet you chose to ignore that question)
Thought so .steppin out for bit more titterJeez. The drivel you write. Yes, nurses, cleaners, radiologists, physiotherapists, receptionists, GPs, healthcare assistants, midwives, ENT specialists, porters, osteopaths - all lying charlatans.
Nout is obvious to Regan...Sorry, you were disputing the idea of 4000 people dying in a day, why change to subject now?
Obviously seasonal flu deaths are down. The people most likely to catch and then die have been vaccinated and have been in isolation for 10 months. How would they catch it?
Sorry, you were disputing the idea of 4000 people dying in a day, why change to subject now?
Obviously seasonal flu deaths are down. The people most likely to catch and then die have been vaccinated and have been in isolation for 10 months. How would they catch it?
flu deaths are suspiciously low and the Covid deaths are suspiciously high
What about places where there has been NO lockdown?
I don't mean countries but places in the UK - like supermarkets.
Are the figures for supermarket workers ten times the national average?
Did everyone who has died from covid catch it in a supermarket or similar place?
That peak was 10 months ago. Admit there was an anomaly there, maybe even many Covid deaths, but flattened out since. Figures recently aren't much higher than a normal winter.
The other countries you refer to were either significantly smaller by population, significantly larger by area or have disturbingly controlling governmental regimes. I'd be interested to know how you think you could beat it in a matter of weeks in this country.I disagree, if the measures are restrictive and strict enough the pandemic can be beaten in a matter of weeks or months. As it has been in other countries.
But the point is how long did it take to keep at bay, those diseases with a vaccine?
They were by and large (with the exception of flu which requires an annual vaccine), diseases not viruses, which we know, mutate.
Can we, will we be sufficiently patient to persist with the other partly applied measures until eventually the vaccine does its job?
And is it a guarantee that the vaccine will keep the virus at bay?
Yes.NO lockdown? Do you see many elderly people in supermarkets?
No, but you said it might have been ten times worse without lockdown.Did you miss the different opening times for elderly and care workers?
Did you miss the memo about masks, sanitiser, distancing and screens? Are you really suggesting that nothing has changed?
Ten times as many ???But supermarket workers are dying, that cannot be disputed. Here's a few that have been reported. Not everybody gets in the papers.
Are you now saying it is the masks, sanitiser, distancing and screens that were effective and the so-called lockdown had no effect?
In 1918, British male life expectancy was 55, American male life expectancy was about 50. In less developed parts of the world it was only 30 years.
So you cannot compare to today's populations - over 40's were not immune to Spanish Flu, they were mostly already dead.
I disagree, if the measures are restrictive and strict enough the pandemic can be beaten in a matter of weeks or months. As it has been in other countries.