Latest Labour-Bashing Headline By DF

A better idea would have been to keep the previous idea running whilst the new "idea" is formulated

But no. Lets stop that and have nothing in place ..................

And Sir Keir Flip Flop Starmer repeatedly said they were going to "smash the gangs"
 
Sponsored Links
A better idea would have been to keep the previous idea running whilst the new "idea" is formulated

But no. Lets stop that and have nothing in place ..................

And Sir Keir Flip Flop Starmer repeatedly said they were going to "smash the gangs"
Can you tell us how much the previous "plan" cost and what it 'actually achieved ' ?


Numbers moved and costs please ? Money better off spent elsewhere
 
Sponsored Links
I think you imagined that.

I'm really starting to think you are Noseall's twin.
 
But after 14 years i thought labour said they had a plan in place , surely they were not lying . Quick enough to cut heating allowances which seemingly they had not planned to do
 
But many global and international roles are UK or US based, because of the flexibility the employer has, to take a chance on the employee safe in the knowledge they have 2 years to see how it goes.

From the "Build, Build, Build" thread.


On one hand, MBK says he is a multinational squillionaire, hiring very-well paid staff. So, you'd expect him, paying chunky wedge for those hires, to have done some due diligence. And accept that, on occasion, he has to account for his decisions, be they good or not-so.

On the other though, MBK prefers to take the plaudits (and the rewards) when his hires perform well, but without fear of the consequences, if they don't.
 
A better idea would have been to keep the previous idea running whilst the new "idea" is formulated
1st problem. Get 300 on a plane and send them there. 80 would need a return flight as no accommodation for them.
2nd problem. Rwanda getting rather coy about how many they could take in total. Initial comment not many.
3rd problem. 52,000 potential candidates for the trip.

Rwanda comments on the 2nd one. Oh we will find some place or the other for them. None specific numbers way short of apparent need. Not just a bit short. Maybe a few thousand but fact is currently they have no idea where they would go LOL and even want numbers to be stated.

You could also look at the deal for those that go. Long terms support and Oh UK processing sensitive cases.

Numbers effects on the country. An eg. It's not easy to get an exact idea of EU born leaving the UK as census data is best however the difference between that aspect and a later population survey shows 500,000 of them have left. "Surely" that sort of number of people leaving should sort all of our problems out.

We need a stop the boats yes but we also need an economically efficient method of handling the ones that are here.
 
Migration Watch
:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
Migration Watch is a right wing propaganda machine.

You meant the Migration Observatory, which is an Oxford Uni off-shoot.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top