Put 17 million or so brexiteers into a room and you'll get 17 million or so answers as to 'their brexit' idea...Clearly the Brexit that transpired did exactly the opposite!
I wouldn't disagree. Dyson had what can prove to be a problem in the UK. He needs a supply chain of a number of items to build his products. He finished up importing so much he switched his manufacture to the far east. This can happen just down to increasing sales. He might even find it difficult to get enough people to put them together. The factory that does that - it's had some bad press. They want as much out their workforce price wise as they can. He keeps design here.my point is economic self interest determines where individuals locate their business not lofty ideals about Brexit.
What makes you think they're homophobic?Strange how the great and the good are whinging about the World Cup in Quatar due in part on there views on gay relationships / homo phobia ??
But don’t seem that bothered about
The thousands of homo phobic migrants crossing the channel into the UK
Tis a strange world
That would make you a Brexiteer too then!Put 17 million or so brexiteers into a room and you'll get 17 million or so answers as to 'their brexit' idea...
But they'll all probably agree on a couple of things...
They don't like foreigners, and they don't care about their children's/grandchildren's life choices!
Mottie has agreed he didn't understand or try to understand brexit. He voted for a slogan with no idea of what would be involved. And he wasn't the only 1, just that he is prepared to admit it. Lord Wolfson is obviously another, even though he is described as ....one of the canniest brains in UK business"Brexers commonly complain about Brexit.
They didn't agree what sort of Brexit they wanted before the referendum, and they still haven't.
It can't be done.
They only got the vote through by letting all the Brexers think they would get the sort they wanted.
I haven't swerved anything...p.s. You’re still swerving that question I asked you in post #8
It's either tell us the benefits or admit there aren't any.I haven't swerved anything...
I believe in freedom of movement in the EU, and hope that the UK will rejoin...
Bringing in the other 'third countries' outside the EU is totally irrelevant, but then that sums you up...
I guess you don't understand that as far as the EU is concerned the UK is now a third country!
And you continue to 'swerve' the question as to why you have chosen to lessen the life choices of your children/grand children...
Why won't you answer that?
And when are you going to tell us of the benefits of brexit?
5 years time?
Or 10 years time?
At some point you're going to have to admit you made a big mistake!
You've never suggested that before.So an 'open door' policy in the U.K. for EU residents is what you’d have. Well I believe in freedom of movement too although unlike you, freedom to work only in so far as for Europeans to fill jobs in the UK that cannot be filled by U.K. workers and as said, with a levy because employers will take advantage of the cheap wages that some Europeans will work for.
Cant see any of them? Have you suggested this tax on immigrants before ?You think? And there was me thinking you knew every post I’d made on here off by heart.
View attachment 285207View attachment 285208View attachment 285209View attachment 285210
Yes, control it, where it's damaging to society, but let people in who can who can contribute," Lord Wolfson said. He suggested a market-based solution to fix current labour shortages, which have affected sectors including healthcare, hospitality and logistics.
He suggests that businesses who need foreign workers should be able to pay a tax of 10% to the government on foreign workers' salaries to ensure that only the businesses that really couldn't find UK workers would recruit overseas.
"It would automatically mean that businesses never bought someone into the company from outside if they could find someone in the UK," he said. "But if they genuinely can't, they'll pay the premium."