Liar .............


Actually you've just admitted i'm right... a few pages ago i said you lot were cop-haters....

I'm so glad you lot are in the minority !!!! :rolleyes:

Who do you mean with "you lot were cop haters"? I don't see it, just the disdain for this one individual police officer. I for one appreciate what the vast majority of police officers stand for and on a whole they do an outstanding job with not enough praise. Harwood however has shown himself for being reckless and has (as stated by the coroner) committed an "unlawful killing". He has to be held accountable in court. That is the democracy we live in, and the judicial system we have!
 
Sponsored Links
Bang on vibro couldnt have said it better myself.
Only thing i may add is it seems like one wreckless person on an apparent power trip giving the rest a bad name. Happens all the time in all walks of life.
 
Bang on vibro couldnt have said it better myself.
Only thing i may add is it seems like one wreckless person on an apparent power trip giving the rest a bad name. Happens all the time in all walks of life.

What I see is a bad cop that has done wrong and the authority he works for has tried to whitewash the whole thing. If not for a public outcry he would not have to answer to the courts.

They all **** in the same pot.
 
Again plenty of spin... !!...................And whilst (i'll say again) i'm gutted he died, you can't know someone might die from a disproportionate action - which is what a shove is.....

Not spin: my point was that there need not have been a shove.

The copper should have employed other means (and there are plenty of things he should have done) before resorting to physical contact.

Again, training. Again, ignored by the copper.
 
Sponsored Links
I do think Marty and LMB forget that.. Ian Tomlinson wasn't a protester that day. He wasn't taking part . His only "Crime" ) walking slowly. Is there a law against that? I don't think so.
Harwood used excessive force, when he shoved him with such force. Police officers are supposed to be extremely observant. Well Harwood must have noticed that Ian had his hands in his pockets and was already walking slowly and unsteadily.
Did he think to himself? An easy target here? Make your own minds up.
Ian Tomlinson was just trying to go to the Lindsey Hotel, a shelter for the homeless on Lindsey Street, Smithfield, EC1. A place he called "Home". Marty just kept harping on about homeless people can't be going home.
I wonder if Marty and LMB would still feel the same , had it been their father/grandfather on the receiving end of a shove that claimed his life ?
 
Not spin: my point was that there need not have been a shove.

The copper should have employed other means (and there are plenty of things he should have done) before resorting to physical contact.

There are a few things a police officer can do with a person who is ambling slowly along the pavement, mumbling to himself.

1) nothing
2) assault him
3) something else, and then assault him if that fails

My money's on (1). All the other cops on the street chose (1)
 
Still waiting for martian to care about those 333 deaths in custody after he 'cared' so much about only 4 deaths and berated others...

Still, nothing unexpected from a police apologist*

*one generalisation deserves another... ;)

What about the 4500 coppers who've died this century protecting your a**e?
As has been said, only a fraction of those were actually killed by anyone intentionally...most died in a way that anyone else could do - just because they have a uniform on doesn't change that!

But for those that were intentionally killed, then hopefully the culprits were caught and jailed...

So I ask again...what do you say about all those who died in police custody?...Do you care about them?
 
Still waiting for martian to care about those 333 deaths in custody after he 'cared' so much about only 4 deaths and berated others...

Still, nothing unexpected from a police apologist*

*one generalisation deserves another... ;)

What about the 4500 coppers who've died this century protecting your a**e?
As has been said, only a fraction of those were actually killed by anyone intentionally...most died in a way that anyone else could do - just because they have a uniform on doesn't change that!

But for those that were intentionally killed, then hopefully the culprits were caught and jailed...

So I ask again...what do you say about all those who died in police custody?...Do you care about them?

Harwood did NOT intentionally kill Tomlinson.
 
Still waiting for martian to care about those 333 deaths in custody after he 'cared' so much about only 4 deaths and berated others...

Still, nothing unexpected from a police apologist*

*one generalisation deserves another... ;)

What about the 4500 coppers who've died this century protecting your a**e?
As has been said, only a fraction of those were actually killed by anyone intentionally...most died in a way that anyone else could do - just because they have a uniform on doesn't change that!

But for those that were intentionally killed, then hopefully the culprits were caught and jailed...

So I ask again...what do you say about all those who died in police custody?...Do you care about them?

Harwood did NOT intentionally kill Tomlinson.

that's why hes charged with manslaughter, get with the program :rolleyes:
 
Maybe not but he still killed him. Dangerous drivers don't mean to kill people - are they innocent too?


Does your missus know you are on the computer at this time of day?
 
Harwood did NOT intentionally kill Tomlinson.

The 2 men jailed for the Tebay disaster also didn't intend to kill any one, but 4 people died due to their actions. They were convicted for manslaughter ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/4816206.stm ). Whats the difference between Harwood and these 2 men. Just because he is a police officer does not mean he is not accountable!
 
What scares me is you lot don't just see a PC with history (allegedly) as a problem... you see "reasonable force that ends in unfortunate circumstance" as a PROBLEM..... we need the fooking police there...

I don't think Tomlinson did much wrong really... but a shove = killer?!!! really? no !! even from a coper with history !!!

You lot are trying to undermine what keeps us safe !!! think about it !!
The 'shove' was in the back of a man who wasn't particularly steady on his feet , wasn't looking and had his hands in his pockets preventing him breaking his fall.
If someone had deliberately shoved your grandad in the street perhaps for walking too slow and he had died and it had been caught on tape would you say 'he did not mean to kill him' or 'string him up'?
The Police had plenty of options in this case. They could have arrested and handcuffed Mr Tomlinson if they felt his actions warranted it. None of the other officers around PC Harwood seemed that concerned.
TBH the other officers around Harwood were very lucky that having witnessed a shambling man being shoved over from behind the mob of actual rioters did not turn on them.
Lets be honest. If a mob really decided as a group to take out ten or twelve police officers using strength of numbers then they could. The only thing stopping that happening is the view that the police are upholding the law and have the authority to do so.
It would only take two or three more officers behaving like Harwood before the whole police were discredited and seen as legitimate targets.
I am a law abiding citizen and believe as you do in the need for the Police to maintain law and order. However I do not actually believe in 'kettling' as a legitimate form of crowd control as it breaches the fundemental human right of innocent until proven guilty.
Mr Tomlinson was in the rioting area but was not a rioter simply a Londoner caught up in the wrong place and probably being driven in the opposite direction of where he actually wanted to go and into the middle of a load of rioters surrounded by Police bearing riot shields , shouting orders and threatening tear gas and police horses , baton charges etc.
I would not have succumed meekly to being herded in that way had I been in London that day and been there on other non riot related business and would without doubt have been arrested for refusing to be bullied into the kettling area.

Kettling is essentially confinement. The court of human rights has said it is legal.
It has not mentioned whether its legality has certain conditions attached.

If an innocent person is pushed into a kettle and is subsequently crushed by the crowd within I would also expect another murder charge to be brought against the police.

With the benefit of hindsight it's easy to sit there and formulate that kind of opinion.
Harwood didn't have that benefit. Again i'll say i know nothing of Harwoods past, and i'm not opposed to him being up for manslaughter - i just hope the judge is lenient because the death was obviously an accident, but less lenient if Harwood has a violent and unruly past.
I wonder if we would be having this debate about a shove had Tomlinson not died? i suspect not. And a shove is not excessive... you lot have 'spun' it up from a firm shove to a 'violent' one. But the police had much more at their disposal, they could've tazered him, pepper sprayed him, trampled him with a horse - but they didn't.

And kettling is not good for anyone, however, it's something the police need to do sometimes in order to keep cotrol of a situation, and usually it's done to protect the public.
Saying it's against your human rights is ridiculous, also saying "you don't believe it to be legitimate form of crowd control" is irrelevant. It's used, so get used to it or challenge it in some supreme court.
As for it going against the principle of innocent until proven guilty, so does disallowing bail - are you saying sick paedos and violent rapists should be let out until their court case?

This could've been a reasonable debate, were it not for the likes of Joe and Peaps... they're the ones i referred to as cop haters... as admitted by peaps. His sort want to get rid of the police or limit their powers so they can no longer function. How can you lot let him come on here with his bile saying "ALL coppers are evil to the core" and let him get away with it? Or do the rest of you think that too?
 
Tomlinson in effect killed himself.

Purposely walked into a riot situation, told to f*ck off, he chose not to, he received a simple push, and his self inflicted timebomb internal organs held their hands up and surrendered.

Simple as that.

Extremely unfortunate ....but it is what it is.
 
Tomlinson in effect killed himself.

Purposely walked into a riot situation, told to f*ck off, he chose not to, he received a simple push, and his self inflicted timebomb internal organs held their hands up and surrendered.

Simple as that.

Extremely unfortunate ....but it is what it is.

well since he is in court after the cps said there is a case of manslaughter to answer put you in the wrong ;)
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top