Loads of Albanians

[Pat ex]

Oh so that means macrons government ? Is not in charge of or runs France

Blimey I thought they did ?

Who runs / governs France than ??

It's a republic, it's run by the people, who elect representatives to govern for them.
Macron is the current head honcho, elected directly by the people, not by the members of his party, as in UK, where the PM is chosen by his party members and is appointed by the sovereign.

Have you had time to think what your racist rants are supposed to achieve, or what they actually achieve?
If you have no idea, I cam only assume that you make these racist rants for no explicable reason.

 

[transam]

It's a republic, it's run by the people, who elect representatives to govern for them.
Macron is the current head honcho, elected directly by the people, not by the members of his party, as in UK, where the PM is chosen by his party members and is appointed by the sovereign.

Have you had time to think what your racist rants are supposed to achieve, or what they actually achieve?
If you have no idea, I cam only assume that you make these racist rants for no explicable reason.

Are the french a race ??

Have you had time to think and work out that the french government run France ??

Have you worked out that Calais is actually in France ?

Best you do instead of going into a rant because you are unable to work out that France is run by the french

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Things are so bad that these illegals are putting negative reviews on trip advisor.

Thank you SO much for taking me in Mrs Bloggs, I simply couldn't take any more of my husbands verbal and physical abuse.

(pause)

Just one small thing, and please don't take this as a criticism, but your fruit sponge is a little bit dry and the tea a little bit too sweet.

 

[noseall]

Well er the Albanians are setting off across the channel from France

You Dummy

Than again you probably don’t know noseall

( no surprise tbh)

So by trans hypothesis, it's the fault of France and deffo not the UK right?

An this is because France was the last country they were in before leaving for the UK?

So by the same set of trans rules, the country they exited prior to entering France is just as culpable? I'm sure you realise that they didn't just leave Albania and enter France, right?

 

[transam]

So by trans hypothesis, it's the fault of France and deffo not the UK right?

An this is because France was the last country they were in before leaving for the UK?

So by the same set of trans rules, the country they exited prior to entering France is just as culpable? I'm sure you realise that they didn't just leave Albania and enter France, right?

So
By your reckoning you think that migrants coming from France on a rubber boat have absolutely nowt to do with France

You on drugs noseall

You dummy

 

[diy_fun_uk]

Isn't it funny how folk try to find every which way to defend the farcical situation we currently have with the boat people.

For me it's as straightforward as this. There are folk coming across a stretch of water into the UK that have traversed other safe countries to get here. It's wrong and needs addressed. Government (French and UK) not doing enough. Get it sorted.

I get fed up with all the round in circles guff typed by some on here trying to defend the status quo.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Isn't it funny how folk try to find every which way to defend the farcical situation we currently have with the boat people.

For me it's as straightforward as this. There are folk coming across a stretch of water into the UK that have traversed other safe countries to get here. It's wrong and needs addressed. Government (French and UK) not doing enough. Get it sorted.

I get fed up with all the round in circles guff typed by some on here trying to defend the status quo.

Most of the people you seem to think are advocating an open door policy are the ones actually wanting an effective system in place to control it, an effective government, with an effective policy. Not just the hot air that we keep getting.

 

[noseall]

By your reckoning you think that migrants coming from France on a rubber boat have absolutely nowt to do with France

Not at all. I'm merely applying your hypothesis that if France is culpable for the migrants entering the UK, then the country they left to enter France is just as culpable. And this should apply equally to each country the migrants left before entering then next, otherwise your hypothesis becomes a nonsense.

 

[Vinty]

Do you think refugees have a legal obligation, to never come go UK?

I thought they had a legal obligation to claim asylum in the first safe country they arrived in.
Maybe France isn't a safe country.

 

[JohnD]

I thought they had a legal obligation to claim asylum in the first safe country they arrived in.

Then you were wrong.

I'm glad you have learned better now.

 

[Vinty]

Then you were wrong.

I'm glad you have learned better now.

Are you sure about that?

 

[JohnD]

Yes.

But by all means waste your time trying to find a law that says what you think it does.

Note:
Rants by the racist Daily Wail, or the racist Priti Useless, are not laws.

 

[Pat ex]

By your reckoning you think that migrants coming from France on a rubber boat have absolutely nowt to do with France

I would hazard a guess that they have absolutely nothing to do with France. They won't be citizens of France, they won't be able to vote in France, they won't be registered with any medical services in France. They won't be paying any direct tax in France, other than VAT.
They won't have any registered address in France. They won't have any vehicles registered in France, etc.

 

[Pat ex]

Isn't it funny how folk try to find every which way to defend the farcical situation we currently have with the boat people.

For me it's as straightforward as this. There are folk coming across a stretch of water into the UK that have traversed other safe countries to get here. It's wrong and needs addressed. Government (French and UK) not doing enough. Get it sorted.

I get fed up with all the round in circles guff typed by some on here trying to defend the status quo.

If UK, with other countries, arranged some form of collective responsibility, and they all took their fair share, I'd support your ideas full heartedly.
But as you often use the excuse for not doing anything, I'll say, it's never going to happen.
So we're stuck with the 'every country for itself' attitude. It's what UK want, it's what they voted for. It's that exact status quo that is desired.
So stop whining.
Asylum seekers have a right to choose which country they prefer in which to claim asylum.
I've already pointed out how ridiculous your idea is that asylum seekers must claim asylum in the first 'safe' (safe according to who's criteria) country.
It's nonsensical for a gay person to flee Saudi Arabia and claim asylum in Sudan.
It nonsensical for a politician to flee Russia and claim asylum in Hungary.

Your argument is nonsensical and based solely on your idea of what constitutes safety.

 

[Pat ex]

Not at all. I'm merely applying your hypothesis that if France is culpable for the migrants entering the UK, then the country they left to enter France is just as culpable. And this should apply equally to each country the migrants left before entering then next, otherwise your hypothesis becomes a nonsense.

And by deduction, the fault of the other countries supplying the means for the government of that country, or its neighbours, of making that country uninhabitable for certain groups.