OK, I think I may now understand. The two cores going to the pumproom are simply 'passing through' that mini-CU, from the supply to the CU in the pumproom - is that correct?
Correct. Well, not yet it's not, but that was my proposal.
If so (a) those cores would need switch-fuse protection
Yes, I can see that now, because effectively they are 25 metres leads from the mains to the CU...
...and (b) given the size of SWA you are thinking about, there's no way that you are going to be able to do that wiring within a standard 'mini-CU, if that's what we are talking about - at the least, you would need a decent sized one.
Yes. Well I was thinking of 10mm SWA, but as the mains is being carried 25 metres down two of the cores, I am now thinking that 25mm is required.
However, in view of the need for a switch-fuse, an alternative arrangement would probably be used
Funny, from the conversation I was just thinking that I need to rethink it!
e.g. terminating the SWA in another box and taking feeds to that from (a) the mini-CU and (b) from the Henleys, via switch-fuse (for the supply to the poolroom CU).
Yes, I can see that. But am I right in thinking that because two of the cores (feeding the CU 25 metres away in the poolroom) are carrying full mains all the way to the switch fuse that 10mm is not sufficient?
If, as in the normal domestic installation, the distance from the supply (meter) is less than 2-3 metres, then additional protection of that cabling is not deemed necessary. However, if the distance from supply to CU is longer than that, fuse protection is considered necessary.
Thanks John, makes perfect sense.