More Rubbish From Johnson

[SirGalahad]

https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/1197652388712075265

You dumbos don't even know how much has been cut and how it compares.

 

[transam]

When Hugo chavez snuffed it in 2013 by which time Venezuelas economic collapse was becoming apparent
Buffoon Corbyn tweeted

Thanks Hugo Chavez for showing that the poor matter and wealth can be shared he made massive contributions to Venezuela and the wider world



About 90% of Venezuelans now live in poverty according to the UN economic commission
For Latin America

 

[Brigadier]

Does buffoon corbyn actually bielieve that 5% of tax payers will fund his massive spending programme

Any one who believes this nonsense is a **ll end

Politics of envy. Always the left's Achilles heel.

I've said it before ; to people like Corbyn, you're "rich" if you have more than them.
In this case, about £500 p. a. more.

Not rich.

 

[transam]

Should buffoon corbyn actually become the PM?

And when his economic policy eventually go's pear shaped he will blame every one else

Same as every other waste of space politician



Dare say we can also look forward to secondary picketing back on the agenda from. His trade union hoppos

 

[JohnD]

Hike up costs on business and it gets passed onto the consumer

wrong

let's suppose you are the owner of a private healthcare company.

Let's suppose you explore your variable costs, and the price sensitivity of your potential customers.

You calculate that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. Any more, and the number of clients drops and your revenues and profits go down.

Any less, and you margins are eroded, and your profits go down.

In year one, you make one million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year two, you make 1.2 million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year three, you had expected to make £1.4 million pounds of profit, but you are compelled by law to increase the wages of your lowest-paid employees from £7.80 to £12.00 per hours. You have one thousand such employees. They are a tiny fraction of your costs. You spend more on tea and biscuits for your conference rooms. On average, these employees work 30 hours a week, 48 weeks a year, so they gain on average £96 a week x 48 = £4,608. You have five hundred such employees. It dents your profits by a little over two million pounds.

You re-examine your costs and, perhaps because there has been zero inflation you still find that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. You still make the same profit as you did the previous year.

Do you put up your prices taking you away from the optimum, peak-profit spot? And lose numbers of clients, which reduces your profits?

If there was a cut in the cost of biscuits, would you have reduced your prices? No, you would have congratulated yourself on improving efficiencies and growing profits.

 

[transam]

Politicians

All. Of em including buffoon corbyn should be made to. Get a job or do a job prior to actually getting to be in government

How many X tradesmen or manual workers that have had to graft for a living are in parliament

The current mob are a
Bunch of be** ends who have never worked for a living

 

[Mottie]

I agree it is wrong that care homes have to be paid for from somebodys home. What is wrong is that it penalises old age progressive dieseases like dementia, parkinsons, stroke etc.

I agree with that and recently we changed our status so that we became tenants in common instead of joint tenants. Basically we both own a separate 50% of the home so when either I or the wife pop our clogs, our 50% share belongs to the kids. This is purely in case the survivor has to go into care if they are affected by the diseases you mention - this way at least 50% of the property will be protected and go to the kids (but hopefully 100%)! Better than it all going in care home fees.

 

[transam]

wrong

let's suppose you are the owner of a private healthcare company.

Let's suppose you explore your variable costs, and the price sensitivity of you potential customers.

You calculate that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. Any more, and the number of clients drops and your revenues and profits go down.

Any less, and you margins are eroded, and your profits go down.

In year one, you make one million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year two, you make 1.2 million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year three, you had expected to make £1.4 million pounds of profit, but you are compelled by law to increase the wages of your lowest-paid employees from £7.80 to £12.00 per hours. You have one thousand such employees. They are a tiny fraction of your costs. You spend more on tea and biscuits for your conference rooms. On average, these employees work 30 hours a week, 48 weeks a year, so they gain on average £96 a week x 48 = £4,608. You have five hundred such employees. It dents your profits by a little over two million pounds.

You re-examine your costs and, perhaps because there has been zero inflation you still find that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. You still make the same profit as you did the previous year.

Do you put up your prices taking you away from the optimum, peak-profit spot? And lose numbers of clients, which reduces your profits?

If there was a cut in the cost of biscuits, would you have reduced your prices? No, you would have congratulated yourself on improving efficiencies and growing profits.

Health care / biscuits

OK



U got a degree

 

[SirGalahad]

This is an interview on BBC newsnight- in one minute even the braindead on here can follow it.

Thats if you want to learn. Or keep the toilets flowing.

https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/1197652388712075265

 

[transam]

This is an interview on BBC newsnight- in one minute even the braindead on here can follow it.

Thats if you want to learn. Or keep the toilets flowing.

https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/1197652388712075265

You won't be able to follow it then

 

[Ryler]

wrong

let's suppose you are the owner of a private healthcare company.

Let's suppose you explore your variable costs, and the price sensitivity of your potential customers.

You calculate that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. Any more, and the number of clients drops and your revenues and profits go down.

Any less, and you margins are eroded, and your profits go down.

In year one, you make one million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year two, you make 1.2 million pounds profit, which you remit via Ireland, Switzerland, Ireland and Holland to your tax-haven in the Caribbean.

In year three, you had expected to make £1.4 million pounds of profit, but you are compelled by law to increase the wages of your lowest-paid employees from £7.80 to £12.00 per hours. You have one thousand such employees. They are a tiny fraction of your costs. You spend more on tea and biscuits for your conference rooms. On average, these employees work 30 hours a week, 48 weeks a year, so they gain on average £96 a week x 48 = £4,608. You have five hundred such employees. It dents your profits by a little over two million pounds.

You re-examine your costs and, perhaps because there has been zero inflation you still find that you can maximise your profits by charging two thousand pounds per client per year. You still make the same profit as you did the previous year.

Do you put up your prices taking you away from the optimum, peak-profit spot? And lose numbers of clients, which reduces your profits?

If there was a cut in the cost of biscuits, would you have reduced your prices? No, you would have congratulated yourself on improving efficiencies and growing profits.

The moral of this story as I see it is the biscuits cost more than the health care products.

 

[SirGalahad]

Brexxers are simply frightened who are too scared to learn facts, they prefer the comfort of lies and liars.

 

[Ryler]

Brexxers are simply frightened who are too scared to learn facts, they prefer the comfort of lies and liars.

buffon corbyn has went to your head.

 

[SirGalahad]

buffon corbyn has went to your head.

I hope you are not in the education sector. Which sector is it again?

 

[transam]

Buffoon corbyn is to. Levy a windfall tax on oil companies to raise 11 billion

But Insist that it will not Increase the cost to the motorist at the pump

They must all have degrees  to work that economic policy out