na the plod don't beat people up

, if she was so innocent, why didn't she just accept she was going to the police station instead of protesting ?

Non evidence that she protested about going to the station. The incident happened inside the police station!
 
Sponsored Links
Police may make wrongful arrests at times, but if this happens without just cause, don't protest so vehemently, and put in a complaint

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

i was arrested 65 times in 1 year there

charged 4 times then dropped

1 crown court trial the judge stopped the fiasco and was aquitted

1 magistrates trial 3 plod 3 different stories aquitted

4 complaints to the ipcc

letter to the cheif constable

end result


JACK

yeah put a complaint in that really does the trick :rolleyes:
 
Non evidence that she protested about going to the station. The incident happened inside the police station!

Well she certainly wasn't complying was she. !
Refused to give a breath test after being found slumped over the steering wheel.
Then decided she didn't want to go to the cells. !

Probably just tired the poor love. :LOL:

I'm not a fan of the police by any means, but this is just all wrong.
 
Sponsored Links
lol :cool:

On a serious note, if proper procedures are to be followed, it needs to be from both sides, which is where my point about official complaints comes into effect. I'm sure that you, Kevplumb, are a model citizen, and that the police were over zealous in their quest to see you the other side of prison bars, :LOL:

BUT............... the old adage about 'no smoke without fire' seems to come into play here..........

You could cite many cases where wrongful arrests have been made or attempted to be made, and to digress and state one, the Menendes affair was one, where he lost his life, but........ why did he run?? If a person is innocent, this shouldn't happen, surely ???
 
don't get me wrong crockett i was a bit of a scally in my younger days ;)

but that don't mean i should be hauled in every weekend

menzies well i must admit you have a point there fair comment :D
 
i fully have sympathy with the police it is extremly difficult to not get cheesed off with guilty people playing up and trying there patience buuuttt
the prisoners could also be innocent[untill proven guilty or innocent]
the policeman could have easily used 2 hands supported under the shoulders what ever
he simply did not treat that person with due care and attention indeed his actions could and where construde as criminal

his superiours should have picked up on his heavy handed dealings and re-trained him in the proper ways or moved him to other duties long before this happened untill fully aware off his wrong doings
to often "the management" turn a blind eye because its easier dont blame the front line staff all the time iff the management can't be aarsed to to help the management get the good pensions and the 4 figure sallary to take responcibility :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

i in no way am supporting the action but feel his superiours could have helped sooner
 
The crime I see reported was 'asleep in a car', it that illegal?

I see no mention of being drunk in a car, using a car, driving a car?

Then I see a person being dragged across a room, asking 'Well why have I been arrested', apparently, not drunk, or slurring words,

Then slung into a cell, after offering little resistance, when detained as such, ie dragged across a room, then faceslammed into the floor.

Was she convicted of a crime?

If someone grabbed me when I was asleep, manhandled me, threw me into a cell, then damn right I'd fight back! I've slept in a car, didn't realise it was illegal. I'd kick ten piles of **** of of who was abducting me.
 
The crime I see reported was 'asleep in a car', .
Nope.

I see no mention of being drunk in a car, using a car, driving a car?.

Refusing a breath test.

Then I see a person being dragged across a room, asking 'Well why have I been arrested', apparently, not drunk, or slurring words,.

On all the cctv I've seen its been silent/zero sound. :confused:

Then slung into a cell, after offering little resistance, when detained as such, ie dragged across a room,.
Yep..... in future any detained person who does not want to go to the cells should be allowed free reign of the building and tokens for coffee and snack machines provided.
Fruit machines and pool table only available to the non-Hannibal Lector types. :rolleyes:

then faceslammed into the floor..
Hardly face slammed. :rolleyes: her head hit the floor because she had no control of her body due to being 'out of the game'

I'd kick ten piles of s**t of of who was abducting me.

ABDUCTING..??????? :eek: .......:LOL: :LOL: Beam me up scotty :LOL: :LOL:
 
I take it that you are a cop, in support of this person that was convicted of this crime? And then break the rules with excessive quoting..

The crime was reported as 'asleep in a car', is that illegal?

Being drunk in a car asleep, is still not a crime.

Never saw any mention of a breath test anywhere in the news report, can you confirm this?

On the cctv I've seen, I hear someone shouting 'shut up and listen to me, you are in my custody, and you will do what I tell you to do', maybe your ears or telly were on mute?

She was 'out of the game' because she was physically thrown to the floor, as evidenced in the cctv, which is clear for all to see.

If I'm asleep, then someone grabs me, takes me to an unknown place, and starts interrogating me, yes I'd classify that as 'abduction', and continually ask, why am I here, what have I done.

Are you currently on this planet LastMagicBean? Where they didn't invent spaces? The guy was CONVICTED of his actions, so how can you defend the undefendable?
 
The crime was reported as 'asleep in a car', is that illegal?.
Nope. But thats not what she was subsequently arrested for.
Being drunk in a car asleep, is still not a crime.
Yes it is. Suspicion of being 'drunk in charge of a motor vehicle'. She doesn't have to be driving it.
Never saw any mention of a breath test anywhere in the news report, can you confirm this?]
Yep. It's in the very first report linked to on this thread. :rolleyes:
I hear someone shouting 'shut up and listen to me, you are in my custody, and you will do what I tell you to do', maybe your ears or telly were on mute?]
Nope that was probably your night warden on the psychiatric ward. :LOL: ;)
She was 'out of the game' because she was physically thrown to the floor, as evidenced in the cctv, which is clear for all to see.]
No she was 'out of the game' and refusing to go to the cell mickey through drunken stubborness.
If I'm asleep, then someone grabs me, takes me to an unknown place, and starts interrogating me, yes I'd classify that as 'abduction', ]
Abduction is being removed unlawfully. In this case her removal was lawful, thus not abduction. !
Are you currently on this planet LastMagicBean? Where they didn't invent spaces? The guy was CONVICTED of his actions, so how can you defend the undefendable?
Mickey, sometimes convictions are harsh, sometimes far too fu*king lenient. Sometimes guilty people go free and sometimes innocent people are banged up. It happens.
 
Unreal. You are defending the undefendable.

THIS PERSON HAS BEEN CONVICTED OF THE OFFENCES RECORED.

At what point will you get that into you fat head?

The offence has happened, it's gone to court, it's been proved. The person is in jail. It's undefendable!
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top