That we're not doing it, at least with no sense of urgency.What part of my post are you saying 'not really' to?
That we're not doing it, at least with no sense of urgency.What part of my post are you saying 'not really' to?
Last February, wind generation was mostly between 10 and 13 GW (like today)
About three times as much as the nukes
And a quarter the price.
Our gas storage capacity has been allowed to run down to avoid maintenance costs. This is now seen as a bad decision as we are very dependent on imports. This has meant paying top whack to get the stuff. Eg as reported on the news a tanker heading to S America and a good way there turned round and came here.
Nail on the head. Longer term strategies for energy, transport, health, education are often talked about but never truly delivered. I suppose it's a consequence of living in a democratic country i.e. one lot in with their strategy, they get voted out x years later, new lot in with their (usually different) strategy.I could point out five gas storage tanks within seven miles of me 10+ years ago (and I'm sure there were more). All gone now. We do seem to like making short-term profitable decisions which later turn out to have long-term ill-effects...
Interestingly (and off-topic), there were two large storage tanks in the next town to me, both sited right next to a railway bridge. The bridge also housed an air raid shelter which was within 500 yards of them.
Nail on the head. Longer term strategies for energy, transport, health, education are often talked about but never truly delivered. I suppose it's a consequence of living in a democratic country i.e. one lot in with their strategy, they get voted out x years later, new lot in with their (usually different) strategy.
I'm going to repeat myself, the UK should be aiming to be 100% self sufficient when it comes to energy generation.
I don't but just mentioning what wind generates is only a tiny part of the problem. Nuke is less as we haven't got as much as we want. The problem is too much use of gas, Perhaps I see the comment about current wind power as irrelevant.You seem to dislike my post.
Texas went cheap on their infrastructure, their Coal and Gas systems froze and shut down, as did a handful of their wind turbines. The main failure was their gas infrastructure.
But you probably didn't know that.
handful ? on the wednesday of the storm 28 gigawatts from thermal source was lost and 18gigabit from renewable . Hardly a handful but then you probably didnt know thatTexas went cheap on their infrastructure, their Coal and Gas systems froze and shut down, as did a handful of their wind turbines. The main failure was their gas infrastructure.
But you probably didn't know that.
Bullshit.handful ? on the wednesday of the storm 28 gigawatts from thermal source was lost and 18gigabit from renewable . Hardly a handful but then you probably didnt know that
From Wikipedia. What's your source?Governor Abbott later acknowledged that coal, natural gas, and nuclear plants had played a role.[46] Five times more natural gas than wind power had been lost.[48